Understanding improper integrals with infinite limits (Type I) and singular points (Type II), their definitions, properties, and the extension of Newton-Leibniz formula.
The Riemann integral requires two conditions:
But many important integrals in mathematics, physics, and probability violate these conditions:
Gaussian Integral
Infinite interval
Arc Length
Unbounded integrand
Both types are defined using limits, extending the Newton-Leibniz formula.
Let be defined on and integrable on every for .
If the limit
exists and is finite, we say the improper integral converges, and define:
If the limit does not exist or is infinite, the integral diverges.
Similarly, for defined on :
For defined on , we split at any point :
The integral converges if and only if both parts converge independently.
The choice of does not affect convergence or the value. Any works.
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
The integral converges with value .
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
The integral diverges.
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Split at :
Total:
Common Mistake:
For , one might think:
This is the Cauchy Principal Value, not the improper integral. The correct evaluation:
Both diverge, so diverges.
A point is a singular point (or singularity) of if as .
Let be defined on with unbounded near .
If the limit
exists and is finite, we say the integral converges and define:
For unbounded near :
If has a singularity at , split the integral:
The integral converges if and only if both parts converge.
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
The function as .
The integral converges with value .
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
The integral diverges.
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Singularity at . Split:
Total:
An integral is mixed if it has both an infinite limit AND a singular point, or multiple singularities.
Strategy: Split the integral so each part has only one "problem" (one infinite limit or one singularity), then check each part independently.
Problem: Analyze
Solution:
Issues: singularity at AND infinite limit. Split at :
Near 0: , and converges.
Near ∞: , and converges.
Both parts converge, so the integral converges.
When splitting a mixed integral:
If and both converge, then for constants :
For any :
And when convergent:
Whether an improper integral converges depends only on the behavior near the "problem" (∞ or the singularity). Changing the integrand on any bounded interval away from singularities does not affect convergence.
If on the relevant interval:
Type I:
Type II (singularity at a):
For the integral with infinite upper limit:
Case p ≠ 1:
As :
Case p = 1: . Diverges.
For the integral with singularity at 0:
Critical Observation:
The conditions are opposite! This is a common source of errors.
Problem: Analyze
Solution:
Split at :
Since one part diverges, the whole integral diverges.
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Substitute , :
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Note as , so this is Type II.
Since (by L'Hôpital):
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Singularities at both and .
Near :
Near :
Both are p = 1/2 < 1, so both parts converge.
Using substitution : the integral equals .
Wrong: Treating as a regular integral and computing .
Right: Recognize the singularity at and evaluate as .
Wrong: Thinking converges for .
Right: For Type II (singular), it's . The conditions are opposite for Type I and Type II!
Wrong: Claiming by symmetry.
Right: Both halves diverge independently. The integral is undefined, not zero. (The symmetric limit gives the Cauchy Principal Value, which is different.)
Wrong: Evaluating as one limit.
Right: Split at . Check (singular) and (infinite) separately.
Wrong: Computing directly.
Right: There's a singularity at inside the interval. Split into .
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Use integration by parts twice, or recognize this as the real part of:
Taking the real part:
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
This is related to the Gamma function. Using integration by parts twice:
The boundary term vanishes. For the remaining integral:
So
Problem: Analyze
Solution:
Singularities at both and .
Near : → p = 1/2 < 1 ✓
Near : → p = 1/2 < 1 ✓
Both singularities are integrable. Using substitution : the integral equals .
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Factor:
Partial fractions:
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Note
Substitute , :
Before evaluating any integral, scan the integrand for points where it might blow up. Check denominators, square roots, and logarithms.
: needs p > 1. : needs p < 1. Opposite!
Many improper integrals require L'Hôpital's rule or known limits like .
For mixed integrals, choose splitting points that separate singularities and infinite limits. Often x = 1 works well.
Substitutions can convert Type I to Type II or vice versa. For example, swaps 0 and ∞.
Many convergence tests for improper integrals parallel those for series. This helps with intuition.
| Integral | Type | Converges? | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | Yes (p=2>1) | 1 | |
| Type I | No (p=1) | — | |
| Type II | Yes (p=½<1) | 2 | |
| Type II | No (p=1) | — | |
| Type I | Yes | 1 | |
| Type I (both) | Yes | π | |
| Type II | Yes | −1 | |
| Mixed | No | — |
Challenge 1
Determine convergence and evaluate if convergent:
Solution: Substitute , so .
The integral converges with value .
Challenge 2
For what values of α does the following converge?
Solution: Check singularities at x = 0 and x = 1.
Near x = 1: By L'Hôpital,
So the integrand is bounded near x = 1 (no singularity).
Near x = 0: for , which is bounded.
For : as , need more careful analysis.
Answer: The integral converges for all .
Challenge 3
Evaluate the following integral:
Solution: Split at x = 1:
For the second integral, substitute , so :
Therefore:
Challenge 4
Prove that the following integral converges:
Solution: Identify singularities in [0, 1]: x = 0 and x = 1.
Near x = 0:
This is a p-integral with p = 1/3 < 1, so it converges.
Near x = 1:
This is also p = 1/3 < 1, so it converges.
Since both singularities are integrable, the integral converges. ∎
Leonhard Euler was the first to systematically study integrals with infinite limits, computing famous results like using ingenious techniques.
Augustin-Louis Cauchy provided rigorous definitions using limits, establishing the foundation for modern analysis. He introduced the concept of principal value for certain divergent integrals.
Bernhard Riemann extended integration theory to handle more general functions and contributed to our understanding of convergence for improper integrals.
Improper integrals and infinite series are deeply connected. The integral test states:
converge or diverge together (for positive, decreasing f).
The Laplace transform is an improper integral:
Used extensively in differential equations and engineering.
Continuous probability distributions require improper integrals:
The normal distribution uses the Gaussian integral.
The Fourier transform is another improper integral:
Fundamental in signal processing and physics.
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Use repeated integration by parts or substitute :
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
This is Type II with singularity at .
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Substitute :
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Type II at x = 0 (ln x → -∞). Integration by parts:
The boundary term at 0:
Problem: Evaluate
Solution:
Substitute , so :
| Integral | Condition | Value |
|---|---|---|
| a > 0 | 1/a | |
| a > 0, n ≥ 0 | ||
| — | √π | |
| — | π/2 | |
| α, β > 0 | B(α,β) | |
| α > 0 | Γ(α) |
| Integral | Converges when | Diverges when |
|---|---|---|
| p > 1 | p ≤ 1 | |
| p < 1 | p ≥ 1 | |
| p > 1 | p ≤ 1 | |
| p < 1 | p ≥ 1 |
Improper integrals extend the power of integration to handle infinite intervals and unbounded functions. The key insights from this section are:
In the next section, we'll develop powerful convergence tests (comparison, limit comparison) that help analyze integrals without computing them explicitly.
Before concluding that an improper integral converges or diverges, verify the following:
An integral is improper if either (1) the integration interval is infinite (Type I), or (2) the integrand becomes unbounded at some point in the interval (Type II). Both types require limits to define.
Type I: Look for ±∞ in the limits. Type II: Check if the function has any singularities (points where it goes to ±∞) within [a,b]. An integral can be both types (mixed).
Yes, but with limits! For Type I: ∫_a^{+∞} f(x)dx = lim_{b→+∞} F(b) - F(a). For Type II with singularity at a: ∫_a^b f(x)dx = F(b) - lim_{ε→0^+} F(a+ε).
Split the integral at any convenient point c: ∫_{-∞}^{+∞} f(x)dx = ∫_{-∞}^c f(x)dx + ∫_c^{+∞} f(x)dx. Both parts must converge independently.
: converges ⟺ p > 1
: converges ⟺ p < 1