Complex numbers extend the reals to ensure every polynomial has roots. They are indispensable for spectral theory in linear algebra—eigenvalues of real matrices may be complex, and the spectral theorem is most elegant over ℂ.
Complex numbers emerged from attempts to solve polynomial equations. In the 16th century, Cardano and Bombelli encountered square roots of negative numbers while solving cubic equations—even for equations with real solutions!
Euler (18th century) introduced the notation for and discovered the remarkable formula .
Gauss gave the first rigorous proofs of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra and popularized the geometric interpretation of complex numbers as points in a plane. Hamilton later provided the formal construction as ordered pairs.
We can construct the complex numbers rigorously as ordered pairs of real numbers with specially defined operations. This shows that is not mysterious—it's simply with a clever multiplication.
The complex numbers is the set with operations:
We write and identify with . Then .
as defined above is a field with:
Most axioms follow from direct calculation. The key is the multiplicative inverse. For , we need .
Let . Then:
This gives the system:
Solving: , .
This is well-defined since when .
Note that .
This is the defining property: we have constructed a field containing in which has a solution.
Compute and .
Addition:
Multiplication:
The powers of cycle with period 4:
In general, .
Compute and .
is a 2-dimensional vector space over with basis . Every can be written uniquely as:
As a vector space over itself, is 1-dimensional. This distinction matters: but .
For :
For all :
Property 2: Let . Then:
Property 3: Using Property 2:
Taking square roots (all quantities are non-negative) gives .
To compute , multiply by :
So the answer is .
Find and .
If is a polynomial with real coefficients and is a root, then is also a root.
Let with .
If , then:
Since , we have .
This theorem explains why quadratics with real coefficients either have two real roots or two complex conjugate roots. For example, has roots .
For , the multiplicative inverse is:
Find .
Solution:
Verify: ✓
The polar form reveals the geometric meaning of complex numbers and makes multiplication and powers much simpler.
Every non-zero complex number can be written as:
where:
For any :
Thus every non-zero complex number can be written as .
If and , then:
Multiplication scales by the product of moduli and rotates by the sum of arguments.
Convert to polar form.
Thus .
Convert to rectangular form.
Solution:
The principal argument of , denoted (capital A), is the unique value of in the interval .
Find the principal argument of:
For nonzero complex numbers and :
Polar form makes multiplication simple: multiply moduli and add arguments. This is much easier than expanding in rectangular form, especially for powers and roots.
Multiply and .
Solution:
Divide by .
Solution:
For any and :
Equivalently, .
Compute .
We have , so:
Since , we get:
The th roots of unity are the solutions to . They are:
The primitive th root of unity is .
If , then the solutions to are:
Find all cube roots of .
Write . The cube roots are:
Compute using polar form.
Solution: First convert to polar:
So .
For , the product of all th roots of unity is:
Using properties of exponents:
When is even, this equals 1. When is odd, this equals -1.
So the product is .
For :
This is a geometric series with ratio :
The 5th roots of unity are for .
These form a regular pentagon on the unit circle!
Let be a primitive th root of unity.
Problem: Find all square roots of .
Solution: Write .
Verify: ✓
Roots of unity appear in:
Every non-constant polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one root in .
Equivalently, is algebraically closed.
This theorem guarantees that the characteristic polynomial of any matrix over factors completely into linear factors. Hence:
Every polynomial with can be written as:
where are the roots (counting multiplicity).
Factor over .
Solution: Find roots by solving :
The roots are:
Every polynomial with real coefficients factors over into a product of linear factors and irreducible quadratic factors.
By the Fundamental Theorem, factors completely over . Since coefficients are real, complex roots come in conjugate pairs: if is a root, so is .
Each conjugate pair gives a real quadratic factor:
This is a quadratic with real coefficients and negative discriminant (irreducible over ).
Factor over .
Solution: Pair conjugate roots:
Therefore:
Complex numbers have a beautiful geometric interpretation as points (or vectors) in the Euclidean plane, often called the complex plane or Argand diagram.
The complex plane identifies with the point .
Multiplying by rotates by :
The point becomes —exactly a counterclockwise rotation!
For all :
Equality holds if and only if and have the same argument (point in the same direction from the origin).
We compute :
Note that .
Taking square roots gives the triangle inequality.
For all :
The equation describes a circle:
For example, is a circle centered at with radius 3.
The equation describes a line.
For and :
This is the line .
The unit circle is the set . Points on the unit circle have the form .
Complex numbers elegantly encode 2D geometry:
Rotate the point by counterclockwise around the origin.
Solution:
The point becomes .
Complex numbers are deeply connected to linear algebra in several ways.
The 2D rotation matrix by angle :
has characteristic polynomial .
The eigenvalues are .
For , these are complex (non-real) eigenvalues!
For vectors , the standard inner product is:
Note the conjugation on the first argument! This ensures .
Without conjugation, .
With conjugation, . ✓
A matrix is Hermitian if (conjugate transpose equals itself).
Hermitian matrices have:
If is a real matrix and is an eigenvalue with eigenvector , then is also an eigenvalue with eigenvector .
Since and has real entries ():
Problem: Compute .
Solution: Multiply by conjugate:
Problem: Find all solutions to .
Solution: Write .
Problem: Prove .
Solution: Use De Moivre:
Comparing real parts: .
Problem: Compute .
Solution: Convert to polar form:
So .
Problem: Solve .
Solution: Use the quadratic formula:
Problem: Verify .
Solution:
Therefore . ✓
Problem: Compute .
Solution: First multiply :
Then multiply by :
Problem: Simplify .
Solution:
Problem: Express in terms of .
Solution: Let and .
Taking real parts: .
Problem: Show that .
Solution: Expand using :
Adding: . ✓
(This is the parallelogram law.)
, NOT . For example, , but .
doesn't account for the quadrant. For , , but the correct argument is .
When finding th roots, there are always distinct roots. Don't forget to find all of them using for .
is a constant with . Don't treat it like an unknown. Simplify powers of : , then repeat.
You cannot say or . Complex numbers have no compatible ordering. Only compare magnitudes: .
with multiplication . This makes .
where and . Multiplication scales and rotates.
. The bridge between exponentials and trigonometry.
Every polynomial over factors completely. Every degree- polynomial has exactly roots.
Complex numbers are essential for spectral theory. Over ℝ, not all matrices have eigenvalues (e.g., rotation matrices). Over ℂ, the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees that every polynomial factors completely, so every matrix has eigenvalues.
Multiplying by z = re^{iθ} scales by r and rotates by θ. This makes complex numbers perfect for describing rotations and scaling in 2D, which generalizes to understanding linear operators geometrically.
No in a strict sense—you can't extend ℂ to 3D while preserving all field properties. However, quaternions (4D) extend complex numbers and are useful for 3D rotations. Octonions extend further but lose associativity.
A field F is algebraically closed if every non-constant polynomial with coefficients in F has a root in F. Equivalently, every polynomial of degree n over F has exactly n roots (counting multiplicity) in F.
To divide by z = a + bi, multiply numerator and denominator by z̄ = a - bi. This gives z·z̄ = |z|² in the denominator, which is a real number, making the division straightforward.
For complex numbers z and w: |z + w| ≤ |z| + |w|. Geometrically, this says the length of one side of a triangle is at most the sum of the other two sides. Equality holds iff z and w point in the same direction.
Euler's identity e^{iπ} + 1 = 0 connects five fundamental constants: e, i, π, 1, and 0, using three basic operations: addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. It links analysis, algebra, and geometry in one elegant formula.
No! ℂ cannot be ordered compatibly with its field structure. If we tried to say i > 0, then i² = -1 > 0, which contradicts -1 < 0. Complex numbers have no natural ordering, only magnitude comparisons via |z|.
The argument of z is any angle θ such that z = |z|e^{iθ}. Since e^{iθ} = e^{i(θ+2πk)}, the argument is only defined up to multiples of 2π. The principal argument restricts θ to a specific range, usually (-π, π] or [0, 2π).
Complex numbers appear throughout physics: AC circuit analysis uses impedance (complex resistance), quantum mechanics uses complex wave functions, and signal processing uses Fourier transforms with complex exponentials.