MathIsimple

Probability Theory – Problem 12: determine the distribution of ;

Question

Let the random variable XX follow the standard normal distribution N(0, 1)N(0,\ 1), and let II satisfy P(I=1)=12=P(I=1)P(I=1)=\frac{1}{2}=P(I=-1), with XX and II independent. For the random variable Y=IXY=IX: (1) determine the distribution of YY; (2) discuss the independence of II and YY; (3) discuss the independence of XX and YY.

Step-by-step solution

Step 1. Express YY via conditional distributions.

Given XN(0,1)X\sim \text{N}(0,1), P(I=1)=12=P(I=1)P(I=1)=\frac{1}{2}=P(I=-1), and X,IX,I are independent. Define Y=IXY=IX.

Conditioning on I=1I=1, YI=1=1×X=X,Y\mid I=1 = 1\times X = X, so YI=1N(0,1).Y\mid I=1 \sim \text{N}(0,1).

Conditioning on I=1I=-1, YI=1=1×X=X.Y\mid I=-1 = -1\times X = -X. Since the standard normal distribution is symmetric about 00, when XN(0,1)X\sim \text{N}(0,1) we have XN(0,1)-X\sim \text{N}(0,1), and therefore YI=1N(0,1).Y\mid I=-1 \sim \text{N}(0,1).

Step 2. Compute the density of YY by the law of total probability.

Denote the standard normal density by φ(y)=12πey22.\varphi(y)=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-\frac{y^{2}}{2}}.

Then fYI=1(y)=φ(y),fYI=1(y)=φ(y).f_{Y\mid I=1}(y)=\varphi(y),\quad f_{Y\mid I=-1}(y)=\varphi(y).

By the law of total probability, for every real number yy, fY(y)=i{1,1}P(I=i)fYI=i(y)=12φ(y)+12φ(y)=φ(y).f_{Y}(y) =\sum_{i\in\{1,-1\}}P(I=i)f_{Y\mid I=i}(y) =\frac{1}{2}\varphi(y)+\frac{1}{2}\varphi(y) =\varphi(y).

Step 3. Conclude the distribution of YY.

Since fY(y)=φ(y)f_{Y}(y)=\varphi(y), which coincides with the standard normal density, we have YN(0,1).Y\sim \text{N}(0,1).

Step 4. Verify independence of II and YY via the joint distribution.

To determine whether II and YY are independent, it suffices to check that for every Borel set BRB\subset\mathbb{R}, P(I=i, YB)=P(I=i)P(YB),i=±1.P(I=i,\ Y\in B)=P(I=i)P(Y\in B),\quad i=\pm 1.

First compute P(I=1, YB)P(I=1,\ Y\in B). When I=1I=1, Y=XY=X, so {I=1, YB}={I=1, XB}.\{I=1,\ Y\in B\} =\{I=1,\ X\in B\}.

Because XX and II are independent, P(I=1, YB)=P(I=1, XB)=P(I=1)P(XB)=12P(XB).P(I=1,\ Y\in B) =P(I=1,\ X\in B) =P(I=1)P(X\in B) =\frac{1}{2}P(X\in B).

By the conclusion of Step 3, YN(0,1)Y\sim \text{N}(0,1), which has the same distribution as XX, so P(YB)=P(XB).P(Y\in B)=P(X\in B).

Therefore P(I=1, YB)=12P(XB)=12P(YB)=P(I=1)P(YB).P(I=1,\ Y\in B) =\frac{1}{2}P(X\in B) =\frac{1}{2}P(Y\in B) =P(I=1)P(Y\in B).

Step 5. Verify the same for I=1I=-1.

When I=1I=-1, Y=XY=-X, so the event {I=1, YB}={I=1, XB}={I=1, XB},\{I=-1,\ Y\in B\} =\{I=-1,\ -X\in B\} =\{I=-1,\ X\in -B\}, where B={x:xB}-B=\{-x:x\in B\}. Hence P(I=1, YB)=P(I=1, XB)=P(I=1)P(XB)=12P(XB).P(I=-1,\ Y\in B) =P(I=-1,\ X\in -B) =P(I=-1)P(X\in -B) =\frac{1}{2}P(X\in -B).

Since XX has the standard normal distribution, P(XB)=P(XB)P(X\in -B)=P(-X\in B). Moreover, XN(0,1)-X\sim \text{N}(0,1), which has the same distribution as YY, so P(XB)=P(YB)P(-X\in B)=P(Y\in B).

Therefore P(I=1, YB)=12P(YB)=P(I=1)P(YB).P(I=-1,\ Y\in B) =\frac{1}{2}P(Y\in B) =P(I=-1)P(Y\in B).

Step 6. Conclude the independence of II and YY.

For both i=1i=1 and i=1i=-1 we have P(I=i, YB)=P(I=i)P(YB),P(I=i,\ Y\in B)=P(I=i)P(Y\in B), and therefore II and YY are independent.

Step 7. Construct an event revealing the dependence between XX and YY.

By definition Y=IXY=IX. Observe that if X0X\neq 0, then Y=XIX=XI=1.Y=X \Longleftrightarrow IX=X \Longleftrightarrow I=1.

Consider the event {X=Y}\{X=Y\}. Since XX has a continuous distribution, P(X=0)=0P(X=0)=0, so in the almost-sure sense the event {X=Y}\{X=Y\} coincides with {I=1}\{I=1\} (they differ only on the null set {X=0}\{X=0\}).

Therefore P(X=Y)=P(I=1)=12.P(X=Y)=P(I=1)=\frac{1}{2}.

Step 8. Derive the consequence of independence for P(X=Y)P(X=Y).

If XX and YY were independent, and since YY also has a continuous distribution (as established in Step 3, YN(0,1)Y\sim \text{N}(0,1)), then for every real number xx, P(Y=x)=0.P(Y=x)=0.

Expanding via conditional probability, P(X=Y)=+P(Y=xX=x)fX(x)dx.P(X=Y) =\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}P(Y=x\mid X=x)f_{X}(x)\,dx.

If XX and YY were independent, then P(Y=xX=x)=P(Y=x)=0,P(Y=x\mid X=x)=P(Y=x)=0, so P(X=Y)=+0×fX(x)dx=0.P(X=Y)=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}0\times f_{X}(x)\,dx=0.

Step 9. Contradiction and conclusion.

On the one hand, from the explicit relation Y=IXY=IX we obtained P(X=Y)=12;P(X=Y)=\frac{1}{2}; on the other hand, under the assumption that XX and YY are independent we derived P(X=Y)=0.P(X=Y)=0.

These two results contradict each other, which proves that XX and YY are not independent.

Final answer

1. YN(0,1)Y\sim \text{N}(0,1), i.e., YY has the same distribution as XX. 2. II and YY are independent. 3. XX and YY are not independent.

Marking scheme

This marking scheme is formulated strictly according to the official solution, with a total of 7 points.


I. Scoring Criteria (Total 7)

1. Distribution of YY (2 points)

  • Chain A: Density/Distribution Function Method
  • Identify the conditional distributions YI=1N(0,1)Y\mid I=1 \sim N(0,1) and YI=1N(0,1)Y\mid I=-1 \sim N(0,1) (or explicitly state that X-X and XX have the same distribution). [1 point]
  • Apply the law of total probability (in density or distribution function form) to combine and conclude that YN(0,1)Y \sim N(0,1). [1 point]
  • Chain B: Characteristic Function Method
  • Write the characteristic function of YY as φY(t)=12φX(t)+12φX(t)\varphi_Y(t) = \frac{1}{2}\varphi_X(t) + \frac{1}{2}\varphi_X(-t). [1 point]
  • Use the symmetry of XX (i.e., φX(t)=φX(t)\varphi_X(t)=\varphi_X(-t)) to obtain φY(t)=φX(t)\varphi_Y(t)=\varphi_X(t) and thereby determine YN(0,1)Y \sim N(0,1). [1 point]

Score exactly one chain.

2. Independence of II and YY (2 points)

  • Chain A: Joint Probability Verification (Official Approach)
  • Verify the case I=1I=1: P(I=1,YB)=P(I=1)P(XB)=P(I=1)P(YB)P(I=1, Y\in B) = P(I=1)P(X\in B) = P(I=1)P(Y\in B) (requires using the independence of X,IX,I and the identical distribution of X,YX,Y). [1 point]
  • Verify the case I=1I=-1: P(I=1,YB)=P(I=1)P(XB)=P(I=1)P(YB)P(I=-1, Y\in B) = P(I=-1)P(-X\in B) = P(I=-1)P(Y\in B) (requires using symmetry) and state the conclusion. [1 point]
  • Chain B: Conditional Distribution Verification
  • Show that for i{1,1}i \in \{1, -1\}, the conditional density/distribution fYI=i(y)f_{Y|I=i}(y) equals the marginal density fY(y)f_Y(y) (i.e., N(0,1)N(0,1)). [2 points]

Score exactly one chain.

3. Independence of XX and YY (3 points)

  • Chain A: Event Probability Contradiction (Official Approach)
  • Construct the event {X=Y}\{X=Y\} (or the equivalent form {Y=IX}\{Y=IX\}) and compute its true probability P(X=Y)=P(I=1)=1/2P(X=Y)=P(I=1)=1/2. [1 point]
  • State that if X,YX,Y were independent and both continuous, then theoretically P(X=Y)=0P(X=Y)=0. [1 point]
  • Identify the contradiction and conclude that XX and YY are not independent. [1 point]
  • Chain B: Higher Moments / Absolute Value Method
  • Identify the functional relation Y=X|Y|=|X|, or compute E[X2Y2]=E[X4]=3E[X^2 Y^2] = E[X^4] = 3. [1 point]
  • State that under independence, P(X<1,Y>2)>0P(|X|<1, |Y|>2)>0 (contradiction) or E[X2Y2]=E[X2]E[Y2]=1E[X^2 Y^2] = E[X^2]E[Y^2] = 1. [1 point]
  • Compare the two results and conclude that XX and YY are not independent. [1 point]
  • Chain C: Specific Region Probability Method
  • Choose a specific region (e.g., X>1,Y<1X>1, Y<-1) and compute the true joint probability (e.g., the probability of this region is 0 or some non-product value). [1 point]
  • Compute the probability product under the independence assumption P(X>1)P(Y<1)>0P(X>1)P(Y<-1) > 0. [1 point]
  • Compare the two results and conclude that XX and YY are not independent. [1 point]

Score exactly one chain.

Total (max 7)


II. Zero-Score Items

  • Merely listing the normal density formula, the law of total probability, or the definition of independence without substituting the problem's variables and performing concrete calculations.
  • In part (3), merely computing the covariance Cov(X,Y)=0Cov(X,Y)=0 or the correlation coefficient equals 0, and then directly asserting that XX and YY are independent (even if the computation is correct, no credit is awarded, as this is a logical trap).
  • In part (3), merely guessing "not independent" based on intuition without mathematical justification.

III. Deduction Items

  • Logical omission: In part (1), if the key property "XX is symmetric about 0" or "XN(0,1)-X \sim N(0,1)" is not mentioned and the result is stated directly, deduct 1 point.
  • Incorrect conclusion: In part (3), if the final conclusion is "XX and YY are independent," the entire subsection (3 points) receives zero credit.
  • Probability confusion: In part (3), if P(X=Y)=1P(X=Y)=1 is claimed (ignoring the case I=1I=-1), causing subsequent reasoning to be based on an incorrect value, deduct 1 point.
Ask AI ✨