MathIsimple

Probability Theory – Problem 41: Compute , where is a real number and is a nonnegative integer;\\

Question

The random variable YY follows an exponential distribution with parameter λ\lambda. Let [y][y] denote the greatest integer not exceeding yy, and define the random variables X=Y[Y], Z=[Y]X = Y - [Y],\ Z = [Y].\\ (1) Compute P(Xx,Z=n)P(X \le x, Z = n), where xx is a real number and nn is a nonnegative integer;\\ (2) Determine the distributions of XX and ZZ;\\ (3) Discuss the independence of XX and ZZ.

Step-by-step solution

1. Identifying the ranges of the variables and the event structure

Since YY has an exponential distribution with parameter λ\lambda, we have fY(y)=λeλy,y>0.f_{Y}(y)=\lambda e^{-\lambda y},\quad y>0.

Let [Y][Y] denote the floor function (the greatest integer not exceeding YY). Then Z=[Y],X=Y[Y].Z=[Y],\quad X=Y-[Y].

Observe that: ZZ takes nonnegative integer values n=0,1,2,n=0,1,2,\dots; for each sample point, 0X<10\le X<1, and Y=Z+XY=Z+X.

2. Rewriting the event {Xx,Z=n}\{X\le x,Z=n\} in terms of YY

The event Z=nZ=n means Z=nnY<n+1.Z=n\Longleftrightarrow n\le Y<n+1.

When Z=nZ=n, we have X=YnX=Y-n, so Xx, Z=n{nY<n+1,Ynx{nY<n+1,Yn+x.X\le x,\ Z=n \Longleftrightarrow \begin{cases} n\le Y<n+1,\\ Y-n\le x \end{cases} \Longleftrightarrow \begin{cases} n\le Y<n+1,\\ Y\le n+x. \end{cases}

Therefore {Xx,Z=n}={nYmin(n+1,n+x)},\{X\le x,Z=n\} =\{n\le Y\le \min(n+1,n+x)\}, and we proceed by cases according to the value of xx.

3. Case analysis by the range of xx

1. Case 1: x0x\le 0

Here Xx0X\le x\le 0 is required, but X0X\ge 0 always holds, so P(Xx,Z=n)=0,x0.P(X\le x,Z=n)=0,\quad x\le 0.

2. Case 2: 0<x<10<x<1

In this case n+x<n+1n+x<n+1, so the integration interval is [n,n+x][n,n+x], and P(Xx,Z=n)=P(nYn+x)=nn+xλeλydy.P(X\le x,Z=n) =P(n\le Y\le n+x) =\int_{n}^{n+x}\lambda e^{-\lambda y}\,dy.

Evaluating the integral: nn+xλeλydy=[eλy]y=ny=n+x=eλneλ(n+x)=eλn(1eλx).\int_{n}^{n+x}\lambda e^{-\lambda y}\,dy =\left[-e^{-\lambda y}\right]_{y=n}^{y=n+x} =e^{-\lambda n}-e^{-\lambda(n+x)} =e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda x}\big).

Hence P(Xx,Z=n)=eλn(1eλx),0<x<1.P(X\le x,Z=n) =e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda x}\big),\quad 0<x<1.

3. Case 3: x1x\ge 1

Since X[0,1)X\in[0,1), when x1x\ge 1 the condition XxX\le x is automatically satisfied, so {Xx,Z=n}={Z=n}.\{X\le x,Z=n\}=\{Z=n\}.

Therefore P(Xx,Z=n)=P(Z=n)=P(nY<n+1)=nn+1λeλydy.P(X\le x,Z=n)=P(Z=n) =P(n\le Y<n+1) =\int_{n}^{n+1}\lambda e^{-\lambda y}\,dy.

Computing this gives nn+1λeλydy=eλneλ(n+1)=eλn(1eλ).\int_{n}^{n+1}\lambda e^{-\lambda y}\,dy =e^{-\lambda n}-e^{-\lambda(n+1)} =e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big).

Hence P(Xx,Z=n)=eλn(1eλ),x1.P(X\le x,Z=n) =e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big),\quad x\ge 1.

4. Summary (final answer for Part (1), stated piecewise)

For any real number xx and nonnegative integer nn, P(Xx,Z=n)={0,x0,eλn(1eλx),0<x<1,eλn(1eλ),x1.P(X\le x,Z=n) = \begin{cases} 0,& x\le 0,\\[4pt] e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda x}\big),& 0<x<1,\\[4pt] e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big),& x\ge 1. \end{cases}

1. Finding the distribution of ZZ

From the computation above, P(Z=n)=P(nY<n+1)=nn+1λeλydy=eλn(1eλ),n=0,1,2,.P(Z=n)=P(n\le Y<n+1) =\int_{n}^{n+1}\lambda e^{-\lambda y}\,dy =e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big),\quad n=0,1,2,\dots.

Thus the probability mass function of ZZ is P(Z=n)=(1eλ)eλn,n=0,1,2,.P(Z=n)=\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big)e^{-\lambda n},\quad n=0,1,2,\dots.

This is a geometric distribution starting at 00 with parameter 1eλ1-e^{-\lambda}.

2. Finding the distribution function of XX

For x<0x<0, since X0X\ge 0, P(Xx)=0,x<0.P(X\le x)=0,\quad x<0.

For 0x<10\le x<1, by the law of total probability, P(Xx)=n=0P(Xx,Z=n).P(X\le x) =\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}P(X\le x,Z=n).

Using the formula from Part (1) (for 0<x<10<x<1; the value at x=0x=0 is also consistent), P(Xx,Z=n)=eλn(1eλx),P(X\le x,Z=n) =e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda x}\big), we obtain P(Xx)=n=0eλn(1eλx)=(1eλx)n=0eλn.P(X\le x) =\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda x}\big) =\big(1-e^{-\lambda x}\big)\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}e^{-\lambda n}.

Since the geometric series satisfies n=0eλn=11eλ,\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}e^{-\lambda n} =\dfrac{1}{1-e^{-\lambda}}, it follows that P(Xx)=1eλx1eλ,0x<1.P(X\le x) =\dfrac{1-e^{-\lambda x}}{1-e^{-\lambda}},\quad 0\le x<1.

For x1x\ge 1, since X<1X<1 holds almost surely, P(Xx)=1,x1.P(X\le x)=1,\quad x\ge 1.

In summary, the distribution function of XX is FX(x)=P(Xx)={0,x<0,1eλx1eλ,0x<1,1,x1.F_{X}(x)=P(X\le x) = \begin{cases} 0,& x<0,\\[4pt] \dfrac{1-e^{-\lambda x}}{1-e^{-\lambda}},& 0\le x<1,\\[8pt] 1,& x\ge 1. \end{cases}

3. Finding the density function of XX

For 0<x<10<x<1, FXF_{X} is differentiable, and the density is fX(x)=ddxFX(x)=λeλx1eλ,0<x<1.f_{X}(x)=\dfrac{d}{dx}F_{X}(x) =\dfrac{\lambda e^{-\lambda x}}{1-e^{-\lambda}},\quad 0<x<1.

For all other xx, the density is 00: fX(x)={λeλx1eλ,0<x<1,0,otherwise.f_{X}(x) = \begin{cases} \dfrac{\lambda e^{-\lambda x}}{1-e^{-\lambda}},& 0<x<1,\\[4pt] 0,& \text{otherwise}. \end{cases}

This shows that XX follows a truncated and renormalized exponential distribution on [0,1)[0,1).

4. Summary of Part (2)

ZZ is a discrete random variable with distribution P(Z=n)=(1eλ)eλn,n=0,1,2,.P(Z=n)=\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big)e^{-\lambda n},\quad n=0,1,2,\dots.

XX is a continuous random variable supported on [0,1)[0,1) with density fX(x)=λeλx1eλ,0<x<1.f_{X}(x)=\dfrac{\lambda e^{-\lambda x}}{1-e^{-\lambda}},\quad 0<x<1.

1. Computing P(Xx)P(Z=n)P(X\le x)P(Z=n)

We know that P(Z=n)=eλn(1eλ).P(Z=n)=e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big).

We compare by cases in xx:

If x0x\le 0, then P(Xx)=0P(X\le x)=0, so P(Xx)P(Z=n)=0.P(X\le x)P(Z=n)=0.

If 0<x<10<x<1, then P(Xx)=1eλx1eλ,P(X\le x)=\dfrac{1-e^{-\lambda x}}{1-e^{-\lambda}}, so P(Xx)P(Z=n)=1eλx1eλ×eλn(1eλ)=eλn(1eλx).P(X\le x)P(Z=n) =\dfrac{1-e^{-\lambda x}}{1-e^{-\lambda}} \times e^{-\lambda n}(1-e^{-\lambda}) =e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda x}\big).

If x1x\ge 1, then P(Xx)=1P(X\le x)=1, so P(Xx)P(Z=n)=P(Z=n)=eλn(1eλ).P(X\le x)P(Z=n) =P(Z=n) =e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big).

2. Comparison with P(Xx,Z=n)P(X\le x,Z=n) from Part (1)

From Part (1), P(Xx,Z=n)={0,x0,eλn(1eλx),0<x<1,eλn(1eλ),x1.P(X\le x,Z=n) = \begin{cases} 0,& x\le 0,\\[4pt] e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda x}\big),& 0<x<1,\\[4pt] e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big),& x\ge 1. \end{cases}

By comparison, for every real number xx and every nonnegative integer nn, P(Xx,Z=n)=P(Xx)P(Z=n).P(X\le x,Z=n)=P(X\le x)P(Z=n).

3. Independence conclusion and intuitive explanation

The above identity shows that the joint distribution of XX and ZZ factors completely into the product of their marginal distributions. Therefore X and Z are independent.X \text{ and } Z \text{ are independent}.

Final answer

1. For any real number xx and nonnegative integer nn, P(Xx,Z=n)={0,x0,eλn(1eλx),0<x<1,eλn(1eλ),x1.P(X\le x,Z=n) = \begin{cases} 0,& x\le 0,\\[4pt] e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda x}\big),& 0<x<1,\\[4pt] e^{-\lambda n}\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big),& x\ge 1. \end{cases}

2. Distribution of ZZ: P(Z=n)=(1eλ)eλn,n=0,1,2,.P(Z=n)=\big(1-e^{-\lambda}\big)e^{-\lambda n},\quad n=0,1,2,\dots.

3. Distribution of XX: fX(x)={λeλx1eλ,0<x<1,0,otherwise.f_{X}(x) = \begin{cases} \dfrac{\lambda e^{-\lambda x}}{1-e^{-\lambda}},& 0<x<1,\\[4pt] 0,& \text{otherwise}. \end{cases}

4. XX and ZZ are independent.

Marking scheme

The following rubric is based on the official solution.


1. Checkpoints (Total: 7 points)

Part (1): Computing the joint probability P(Xx,Z=n)P(X \le x, Z = n) (3 points)

  • Integration interval and event transformation: For the nontrivial case 0<x<10 < x < 1, correctly transforming the event {Xx,Z=n}\{X \le x, Z = n\} into {nYn+x}\{n \le Y \le n+x\} (or writing the corresponding integral nn+x\int_n^{n+x} \dots). (1 point)
  • Core integral computation: Correctly obtaining the probability expression eλn(1eλx)e^{-\lambda n}(1 - e^{-\lambda x}) for 0<x<10 < x < 1. (1 point)
  • Completeness/boundary cases: Correctly stating that the probability equals eλn(1eλ)e^{-\lambda n}(1 - e^{-\lambda}) when x1x \ge 1 (including the case x0x \le 0 giving 00; credit is awarded even if only the x1x \ge 1 result is stated). (1 point)

Part (2): Computing the marginal distributions (2 points)

  • Distribution of ZZ: Explicitly giving the probability mass function P(Z=n)=(1eλ)eλnP(Z=n) = (1 - e^{-\lambda})e^{-\lambda n} (identifying it as a geometric distribution or directly writing the formula). (1 point)
  • Distribution of XX: Using the law of total probability to sum the joint distribution (must show the geometric series summation n=0eλn=11eλ\sum_{n=0}^\infty e^{-\lambda n} = \frac{1}{1-e^{-\lambda}} or an equivalent integration process), obtaining the distribution function FX(x)=1eλx1eλF_X(x) = \frac{1-e^{-\lambda x}}{1-e^{-\lambda}} or the density function. (1 point)

Part (3): Discussion of independence (2 points)

  • Verification of the independence criterion: Explicitly showing that the joint distribution equals the product of the marginal distributions, i.e., verifying P(Xx,Z=n)=P(Xx)P(Z=n)P(X \le x, Z=n) = P(X \le x)P(Z=n) for all values of the variables. (1 point)
  • Conclusion: Explicitly concluding that XX and ZZ are independent. (1 point)
  • *Note: If the factorization verification is not performed and independence is asserted solely by invoking the memoryless property of the exponential distribution, only this conclusion point (1 point) is awarded.*

Total (max 7)


2. Zero-credit items

  • Merely copying the definitions of X,Y,ZX, Y, Z from the problem statement or the exponential distribution density formula without performing any derivation.
  • In Part (2), only writing down the defining integral or summation expression (e.g., P(Z=n)=P(Z=n)=\int \dots) without computing the explicit result.
  • In Part (3), answering only the word "independent" with no supporting reasoning or computation.

3. Deductions

*The maximum single-item deduction principle applies; the minimum score is 0.*

  • Computational errors: Algebraic mistakes in integration, differentiation, or series summation (e.g., sign errors, missing the coefficient λ\lambda), -1 point per occurrence.
  • Missing domain/variable ranges: Failing to specify the ranges of variables in the final results (e.g., n=0,1,n=0,1,\dots or 0<x<10 < x < 1), -1 point (deducted at most once for the entire problem).
  • Circular reasoning: In Parts (1) and (2), assuming that XX and ZZ are independent in order to compute the joint or marginal distributions (e.g., directly writing P(X,Z)P(X,Z) as a product), creating a logical circularity. The total score for this problem is capped at 3 points (credit is given only for correctly computed marginal distributions within this portion).
Ask AI ✨