MathIsimple

Probability Theory – Problem 50: find:

Question

Let p(0.5,1)p \in (0.5,1). Using a probabilistic method, find: limn(2n+1)k=0n(2n+1k)pk(1p)2n+1k\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} (2n+1)\cdot \sum_{k = 0}^n \binom{2n+1}{k} p^k(1-p)^{2n+1-k}.

Step-by-step solution

Let S2n+1Binomial(2n+1,p)S_{2n+1} \sim \text{Binomial}(2n+1, p). Then k=0n(2n+1k)pk(1p)2n+1k=P(S2n+1n).\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{2n+1}{k} p^k (1-p)^{2n+1-k} = P(S_{2n+1} \le n). Since p>0.5p > 0.5, the expectation E[S2n+1]=(2n+1)p>n+0.5E[S_{2n+1}] = (2n+1)p > n + 0.5 (for large nn), so P(S2n+1n)P(S_{2n+1} \le n) is very small. Standardization: μ=E[S2n+1]=(2n+1)p,\mu = E[S_{2n+1}] = (2n+1)p, σ2=Var(S2n+1)=(2n+1)p(1p).\sigma^2 = \mathrm{Var}(S_{2n+1}) = (2n+1)p(1-p). Let Zn=S2n+1μσ.Z_n = \frac{S_{2n+1} - \mu}{\sigma}. The event {S2n+1n}\{S_{2n+1} \le n\} is equivalent to Znn(2n+1)p(2n+1)p(1p).Z_n \le \frac{n - (2n+1)p}{\sqrt{(2n+1)p(1-p)}}. Let q=1pq = 1-p, so p>0.5p > 0.5 implies q<0.5q < 0.5.

n(2n+1)p=n(2n+1)p=n2npp=(2p1)np.n - (2n+1)p = n - (2n+1)p = n - 2np - p = - (2p-1)n - p. Since 2p1>02p-1 > 0, for large nn this value is negative with magnitude (2p1)n\approx -(2p-1)n.

More precisely: n(2n+1)pσ=(2p1)np(2n+1)pq.\frac{n - (2n+1)p}{\sigma} = \frac{- (2p-1)n - p}{\sqrt{(2n+1)pq}}. Let δ=2p1>0\delta = 2p-1 > 0. Then nμσδn2npq=δ2pqn.\frac{n - \mu}{\sigma} \approx -\frac{\delta n}{\sqrt{2n pq}} = -\frac{\delta}{\sqrt{2pq}} \cdot \sqrt{n}. So it tends to -\infty like cn-c\sqrt{n}, where c=δ2pq>0c = \frac{\delta}{\sqrt{2pq}} > 0.

For the standard normal distribution, as xx \to -\infty, the Mills ratio inequality gives: ϕ(x)Φ(x)x,x.\frac{\phi(x)}{\Phi(x)} \sim -x, \quad x \to -\infty. More precisely: if xx \to -\infty, then Φ(x)ϕ(x)x.\Phi(x) \sim \frac{\phi(x)}{|x|}. Here xncnx_n \approx -c\sqrt{n}, so ϕ(xn)=12πexn2/212πec2n/2.\phi(x_n) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-x_n^2/2} \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-c^2 n/2}. Thus Φ(xn)ϕ(xn)cn.\Phi(x_n) \sim \frac{\phi(x_n)}{c\sqrt{n}}.

Therefore P(S2n+1n)1cn12πec2n/2.P(S_{2n+1} \le n) \sim \frac{1}{c\sqrt{n}} \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-c^2 n/2}.

(2n+1)P(S2n+1n)2ncn12πec2n/2=2nc2πec2n/2.(2n+1) P(S_{2n+1} \le n) \sim \frac{2n}{c\sqrt{n}} \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-c^2 n/2} = \frac{2\sqrt{n}}{c\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-c^2 n/2}. As nn \to \infty, the exponential decay ec2n/2e^{-c^2 n/2} dominates the n\sqrt{n} growth, so (2n+1)P(S2n+1n)0.(2n+1) P(S_{2n+1} \le n) \to 0. Therefore limn(2n+1)k=0n(2n+1k)pk(1p)2n+1k=0\lim_{n \to \infty} (2n+1)\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{2n+1}{k}p^{k}(1-p)^{2n+1-k} =0

Final answer

0

Marking scheme

The following is the grading rubric for this probability limit problem (maximum 7 points).


1. Key Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)

Group 1: Probabilistic Model Conversion [additive]

  • Recognizing that the summation (2n+1k)pk(1p)2n+1k\sum \binom{2n+1}{k} p^k(1-p)^{2n+1-k} is the cumulative probability P(S2n+1n)P(S_{2n+1} \le n) of a binomial distribution (or an equivalent random variable representation). (1 pt)
  • *Note: If no random variable is introduced but subsequent calculations fully follow the normal approximation formula, credit may be awarded retroactively.*

Group 2: Core Analysis and Decay Estimate (Score exactly one chain)

*For different solution paths, select one of the following for grading; if a mixed approach is used, take the highest-scoring path.*

  • Path A: Normal Approximation and Asymptotic Analysis (Official Solution)
  • Standardization parameters: Writing or using the correct mean μ=(2n+1)p\mu=(2n+1)p and variance σ2=(2n+1)p(1p)\sigma^2=(2n+1)p(1-p), and attempting to standardize Z=SμσZ = \frac{S-\mu}{\sigma}. (1 pt)
  • Boundary asymptotic behavior: Analyzing the standardized upper bound xn=nμσx_n = \frac{n-\mu}{\sigma} and explicitly stating that its order of magnitude as nn\to\infty is cn-c\sqrt{n} (i.e., tending to negative infinity proportionally to n\sqrt{n}). (2 pts)
  • *If only the algebraic expression is written without simplification or without identifying the n\sqrt{n} relationship, no credit for this item.*
  • Tail probability estimate: Citing the Mills Ratio or the normal distribution tail asymptotic formula (Φ(x)1x2πex2/2\Phi(x) \sim \frac{1}{|x|\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-x^2/2}), and explicitly obtaining that the probability term exhibits exponential decay (e.g., ecne^{-cn} or ec2n/2e^{-c^2 n/2}). (2 pts)
  • Path B: Large Deviations / Concentration Inequalities (Hoeffding/Chernoff Bound)
  • Inequality setup: Correctly setting the inequality parameters, identifying the deviation quantity ϵ=p0.5>0\epsilon = p - 0.5 > 0 (or noting that the distance between the expected mean and nn is linear O(n)O(n)). (2 pts)
  • Exponential upper bound establishment: Applying the inequality to obtain an exponential upper bound of the form P(S2n+1n)CeknP(S_{2n+1} \le n) \le C e^{-kn}. (3 pts)

Group 3: Limit Conclusion [additive]

  • Resolving the indeterminate form: Combining the linear growth of the prefactor (2n+1)(2n+1) with the exponential decay of the probability term to conclude that the limit is 0. (1 pt)
  • *Requirement: Must demonstrate the logic that "exponential decay dominates polynomial/linear growth." Concluding merely from the probability tending to 0 without comparing rates earns no credit for this item.*

Total (max 7) check: 1 + 5 + 1 = 7.


2. Zero-credit items

  • Merely copying the problem or listing the binomial expansion formula without any specific computation.
  • Only giving the answer "0" without any process.
  • Incorrectly using Chebyshev's inequality to prove the limit is 0: Chebyshev's inequality can only give an O(1/n)O(1/n) upper bound, which when multiplied by (2n+1)(2n+1) yields a constant limit, and cannot prove the limit is 0. If this path claims to have proved the result, it is treated as a logical error and only the model conversion point (if any) is awarded.
  • Assuming p=0.5p=0.5 or other specific numerical values for the computation.

3. Deductions

  • Logical gap cap (Cap at 2/7):
  • If the student uses the CLT only to obtain P(Sn)Φ()=0P(S \le n) \to \Phi(-\infty) = 0 without analyzing the rate of convergence (i.e., without explaining why the 00 \cdot \infty indeterminate form yields 0 rather than something else), the total score cannot exceed 2 points (only the model and parameter points).
  • Computation/notation error (-1):
  • Coefficient errors in the mean or variance computation (e.g., omitting 2n+12n+1), provided they do not affect the core qualitative conclusion of "exponential decay."
  • Inequality direction error (-1):
  • In Path B, writing the inequality in the wrong direction (e.g., writing PP \ge \dots), but the subsequent logic assumes the correct direction.
  • Maximum deduction principle: Errors within the same logical chain are not penalized repeatedly; the total score after deductions cannot be less than 0.
Ask AI ✨