MathIsimple

Probability Theory – Problem 53: Prove that

Question

Let ξn\xi_n follow the standard normal distribution. Prove that lim supnξn2lnn=1texta.s.\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} = 1 \\text{ a.s.}

Step-by-step solution

Step 1. Prove that lim supnξn2lnn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \le 1 a.s. By the definition of limsup, this is equivalent to showing that for any given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, the event ξn2lnn>1+ϵ\frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} > 1 + \epsilon can occur only finitely many times. By the first Borel-Cantelli lemma, if the sum of probabilities of a sequence of events AnA_n converges, i.e., n=1P(An)<\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(A_n) < \infty, then the probability that these events occur infinitely often is 0. Define the event An={ξn2lnn>1+ϵ}A_n = \left\{ \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} > 1 + \epsilon \right\}. We need to estimate the tail probability P(An)P(A_n) of the standard normal random variable ξn\xi_n. For a standard normal variable ZZ, when x>0x > 0, the tail probability has the well-known upper bound: P(Z>x)=x12πet2/2dt<12πxex2/2P(Z > x) = \int_x^\infty \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-t^2/2} dt < \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}x} e^{-x^2/2} Let xn=(1+ϵ)2lnnx_n = (1+\epsilon)\sqrt{2\ln n}, then P(An)=P(ξn>xn)P(A_n) = P(\xi_n > x_n). Computing the exponential part: exn2/2=e((1+ϵ)2lnn)2/2=e(1+ϵ)2lnn=n(1+ϵ)2e^{-x_n^2/2} = e^{-((1+\epsilon)\sqrt{2\ln n})^2/2} = e^{-(1+\epsilon)^2 \ln n} = n^{-(1+\epsilon)^2} Substituting into the probability upper bound estimate: P(An)<12π(1+ϵ)2lnnn(1+ϵ)2P(A_n) < \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}(1+\epsilon)\sqrt{2\ln n}} n^{-(1+\epsilon)^2} Consider the series n=1P(An)\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(A_n). Since (1+ϵ)2>1(1+\epsilon)^2 > 1, the pp-series n=1n(1+ϵ)2\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-(1+\epsilon)^2} converges. The factor 12π(1+ϵ)2lnn\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}(1+\epsilon)\sqrt{2\ln n}} decreases as nn increases and does not affect the convergence of the series. Therefore, by the comparison test, n=1P(An)\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(A_n) converges. By the first Borel-Cantelli lemma, the probability that AnA_n occurs infinitely often is 0. This means that almost surely, for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, lim supnξn2lnn1+ϵ\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \le 1 + \epsilon. Since ϵ\epsilon can be arbitrarily small, we conclude lim supnξn2lnn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \le 1 a.s.

Step 2. Prove that lim supnξn2lnn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \ge 1 a.s. This is equivalent to showing that for any 0<ϵ<10 < \epsilon < 1, the event ξn2lnn>1ϵ\frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} > 1 - \epsilon occurs infinitely often. Since the ξn\xi_n are mutually independent random variables, the events Bn={ξn2lnn>1ϵ}B_n = \left\{ \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} > 1 - \epsilon \right\} are also mutually independent. By the second Borel-Cantelli lemma, if the sum of probabilities of independent events BnB_n diverges, i.e., n=1P(Bn)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(B_n) = \infty, then the probability that these events occur infinitely often is 1. We need a lower bound estimate for the tail probability P(Bn)P(B_n). For a standard normal variable ZZ, as xx \to \infty, the following lower bound holds: P(Z>x)>(1x1x3)12πex2/2P(Z > x) > \left(\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^3}\right) \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-x^2/2} Let yn=(1ϵ)2lnny_n = (1-\epsilon)\sqrt{2\ln n}, then P(Bn)=P(ξn>yn)P(B_n) = P(\xi_n > y_n). The exponential part is: eyn2/2=e((1ϵ)2lnn)2/2=e(1ϵ)2lnn=n(1ϵ)2e^{-y_n^2/2} = e^{-((1-\epsilon)\sqrt{2\ln n})^2/2} = e^{-(1-\epsilon)^2 \ln n} = n^{-(1-\epsilon)^2} As nn \to \infty, yny_n \to \infty, so 1yn1yn3\frac{1}{y_n} - \frac{1}{y_n^3} is of the same order as 1yn\frac{1}{y_n}. There exists a constant C>0C > 0 such that for sufficiently large nn: P(Bn)>Cyneyn2/2=C(1ϵ)2lnnn(1ϵ)2P(B_n) > \frac{C}{y_n} e^{-y_n^2/2} = \frac{C}{(1-\epsilon)\sqrt{2\ln n}} n^{-(1-\epsilon)^2} Consider the series n=1P(Bn)\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(B_n). Since 0<ϵ<10 < \epsilon < 1, we have (1ϵ)2<1(1-\epsilon)^2 < 1. The series n=21nplnn\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n^p \sqrt{\ln n}} diverges when p1p \le 1. Here p=(1ϵ)2<1p = (1-\epsilon)^2 < 1, so the series n=2n(1ϵ)2lnn\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{n^{-(1-\epsilon)^2}}{\sqrt{\ln n}} diverges. By the comparison test, n=1P(Bn)\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(B_n) diverges. By the second Borel-Cantelli lemma, the probability that BnB_n occurs infinitely often is 1. That is, almost surely, for any 0<ϵ<10 < \epsilon < 1, lim supnξn2lnn1ϵ\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \ge 1 - \epsilon. Since ϵ\epsilon can be arbitrarily close to 0, we conclude lim supnξn2lnn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \ge 1 a.s.

Step 3. Combining the conclusions of Steps 1 and 2, on the one hand we have almost surely lim supnξn2lnn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \le 1, and on the other hand almost surely lim supnξn2lnn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \ge 1. Therefore, both inequalities must hold simultaneously.

Final answer

QED.

Marking scheme

The following is the grading rubric:

  • Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)

Part 1: Proving the upper bound lim sup1\limsup \le 1 [additive, 3 pts total]

  • Normal tail probability upper bound estimate: Citing the standard normal tail inequality (e.g., Mill's Ratio) or the asymptotic equivalence P(Z>x)12πxex2/2P(Z>x) \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}x}e^{-x^2/2}, and establishing the estimate for xn=(1+ϵ)2lnnx_n = (1+\epsilon)\sqrt{2\ln n}. (1 pt)
  • Series convergence determination: Correctly deriving that the probability term is of order O(n(1+ϵ)2)O(n^{-(1+\epsilon)^2}) (or similar form), and noting that since the exponent (1+ϵ)2>1(1+\epsilon)^2 > 1, the series P(An)\sum P(A_n) converges. (1 pt)
  • Applying the first Borel-Cantelli lemma: From the series convergence, concluding that the events occur only finitely often (or with probability 0), thereby establishing lim supξn2lnn1+ϵ\limsup \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \le 1+\epsilon. (1 pt)

Part 2: Proving the lower bound lim sup1\limsup \ge 1 [additive, 3 pts total]

  • Normal tail probability lower bound estimate: Citing the tail lower bound inequality or using asymptotics, and establishing the estimate for yn=(1ϵ)2lnny_n = (1-\epsilon)\sqrt{2\ln n}. (1 pt)
  • Series divergence determination: Correctly deriving that the probability term is of order O(n(1ϵ)2(lnn)1/2)O(n^{-(1-\epsilon)^2} (\ln n)^{-1/2}) (or similar form), and noting that since the exponent (1ϵ)2<1(1-\epsilon)^2 < 1, the series P(Bn)\sum P(B_n) diverges. (1 pt)
  • Applying the second Borel-Cantelli lemma: From the series divergence and the mutual independence of ξn\xi_n, concluding that the events occur infinitely often (or with probability 1), thereby establishing lim supξn2lnn1ϵ\limsup \frac{\xi_n}{\sqrt{2\ln n}} \ge 1-\epsilon. (1 pt)

Part 3: Combined conclusion [1 pt total]

  • Arbitrariness of ϵ\epsilon: Combining the conclusions of Parts 1 and 2, using the fact that ϵ\epsilon can be arbitrarily small (ϵ0\epsilon \to 0), to obtain the final equality. (1 pt)

Total (max 7)

  • Zero-credit items
  • Merely copying the definition of lim sup\limsup or the statement of the Borel-Cantelli lemmas without performing any specific computation involving the normal distribution.
  • Attempting to use the Central Limit Theorem (CLT) or the Law of Large Numbers (LLN) to prove this almost sure convergence property (incorrect method).
  • Treating the sequence of random variables as a deterministic sequence and computing the limit, completely ignoring the probability measure.
  • In proving the upper bound, not introducing ϵ\epsilon or c>1c > 1 and directly substituting c=1c=1, causing the series to diverge and making it impossible to establish the upper bound.
  • Deductions
  • Missing independence statement (-1): When using the second Borel-Cantelli lemma to prove the lower bound, failing to explicitly mention or verify the independence of the random variable sequence ξn\xi_n (this is a necessary condition for BC2).
  • Series determination logic error (-1): When determining the convergence of np\sum n^{-p}, incorrectly judging the relationship between pp and 1 (e.g., claiming convergence when p<1p < 1); even if the final conclusion happens to be correct, points are still deducted.
  • Symbol confusion (-1): Seriously confusing lim\lim with lim sup\limsup, e.g., claiming that the limit of ξn/2lnn\xi_n / \sqrt{2\ln n} exists (in fact, this sequence oscillates between [1,1][-1, 1] and the limit does not exist).
Ask AI ✨