Question
Let be independent and identically distributed with . Define Let . Prove that there exist constants and such that converges in distribution to the standard normal distribution.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1. Proof that is a stationary sequence. By hypothesis, are i.i.d., and (where denotes the indicator function, taking value 1 when the condition holds and 0 otherwise). For any integer and , the joint distribution of depends only on the joint distribution of : , and its joint probability is determined by the i.i.d. property of . After a time shift, corresponds to ; since is stationary, the two joint distributions are identical. Therefore, is a stationary sequence. Step 2. Compute the constant . Since is a 0-1 random variable, . By the i.i.d. property of with : Hence . Step 3. Compute the autocovariance function and verify absolute summability. The covariance is . Cases for : - When : . Since , , so - When : , . If then , forcing , so . Thus and . - When : The index sets and do not overlap; by independence, and are independent, so . Absolute sum: Step 4. Proof that is ergodic. Since is i.i.d., it is ergodic. Since is a measurable function of , and a measurable transformation of a stationary ergodic sequence remains ergodic, is ergodic. Step 5. Application of the CLT for stationary ergodic sequences. For the stationary ergodic sequence , if (1) is finite and (2) the autocovariance is absolutely summable, then where . Computing: Hence . Step 6. Conclusion. There exist constants and such that
Final answer
QED.
Marking scheme
The following is the grading rubric for this statistics/probability problem.
1. Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)
Shared prerequisites (Calculation of Moments) [max 5 pts]
*Award these points regardless of the theoretical approach used (Ergodicity vs. -dependence).*
- Mean computation (1 pt)
- Correctly computing .
- Autocovariance structure analysis (3 pts)
- Variance term (): Correctly computing [additive].
- Adjacent covariance (): Correctly computing .
- *Note: Must demonstrate the key logic that (mutually exclusive events); if only the result is stated without justification, deduct 0.5.* [additive]
- Uncorrelatedness (): Stating that when the gap , and are independent (or uncorrelated), i.e., the covariance is 0 [additive].
- Asymptotic variance computation (1 pt)
- Correctly applying or computing via to obtain ().
- *If preceding covariance computations have errors but the formula and substitution logic are correct, this point may still be awarded (follow-through).*
Score exactly one chain below for the Theoretical Proof:
Chain A: Stationary Ergodic Sequence Path [max 2 pts]
- Sequence property identification: Explicitly stating that is stationary and ergodic. *Derived from the i.i.d. property of and the fact that is a measurable function thereof.* [1 pt]
- Theorem citation: Citing the CLT for stationary ergodic sequences and indicating that the conditions are satisfied (e.g., finite second moment, absolute summability of autocovariance). [1 pt]
Chain B: -Dependent Sequence Path [max 2 pts]
- Sequence property identification: Explicitly stating that is a -dependent sequence (-dependent with ). *Variables separated by more than 1 index are independent.* [1 pt]
- Theorem citation: Citing the CLT for -dependent sequences. [1 pt]
Total (max 7)
2. Zero-credit items
- Incorrect premise: Assuming is i.i.d. and directly applying the i.i.d. CLT (yielding ).
- Merely copying the problem: Only restating definitions or given conditions with no derivation.
- Irrelevant theorem: Citing the SLLN to prove convergence to a constant without discussing convergence in distribution.
3. Deductions
- Arithmetic error: Errors in simple arithmetic steps leading to incorrect or . [-1 flat]
- Symbol confusion: Confusing (standard deviation) with (variance), e.g., computing but stating . [-0.5 flat]
- Logical gap: When computing , failing to explain why and directly giving an incorrect nonzero value. [-1 flat]