Question
The random variable follows the standard normal distribution , satisfies , and are independent. For the random variable : (1) Compute the distribution of ; (2) Discuss the independence of and ; (3) Discuss the independence of and .
Step-by-step solution
1. Representing via conditional distributions
Given , , and are independent. Define .
Conditioning on : so
Conditioning on : Since the standard normal distribution is symmetric about , when , we have , so
2. Computing the density of via the law of total probability
Let denote the standard normal density. Then
By the law of total probability, for each real number :
3. Conclusion for the distribution of
Since , which is the standard normal density,
1. Verifying independence via joint distributions
To determine whether and are independent, we check whether for any Borel set ,
First compute . When , , so Since and are independent, By the result from Part 1, , which has the same distribution as , so Therefore
2. Verification for
When , , so where . Thus
Since follows the standard normal distribution, . Moreover, , which has the same distribution as , so . Hence
3. Conclusion on independence of and
For both and , holds, so and are independent.
1. Constructing an event that reveals dependence
By definition . Note that if , then Consider the event . Since has a continuous distribution, , so in the almost sure sense, and are the same event (differing only on the zero-probability set ). Therefore
2. What independence would imply for
If and were independent, and also has a continuous distribution (as shown in Part 1, ), then for any real number , Expanding via conditional probability: If and are independent, then so
3. Contradiction and conclusion
On one hand, from the specific relationship , we obtained on the other hand, under the assumption that and are independent, we derived This is a contradiction, so and are not independent.
Final answer
1. , having the same distribution as . 2. and are independent. 3. and are not independent.
Marking scheme
This marking scheme is based strictly on the official solution, with a maximum of 7 points.
I. Checkpoints (Total 7)
1. Distribution of (2 points)
- Chain A: Density/distribution function method
- State the conditional distributions and (or explicitly state that has the same distribution as ). [1 pt]
- Use the law of total probability (density or distribution function form) to combine, obtaining the conclusion . [1 pt]
- Chain B: Characteristic function method
- Write the characteristic function expression . [1 pt]
- Use the symmetry of () to obtain , thereby determining . [1 pt]
Score exactly one chain.
2. Independence of and (2 points)
- Chain A: Joint probability verification (standard approach)
- Verify the case: (using independence of and identical distributions of ). [1 pt]
- Verify the case: (using symmetry) and state the conclusion. [1 pt]
- Chain B: Conditional distribution verification
- Show that for , the conditional density/distribution equals the marginal density (i.e., ). [2 pts]
Score exactly one chain.
3. Independence of and (3 points)
- Chain A: Event probability contradiction (standard approach)
- Construct the event (or equivalent form ) and compute its actual probability . [1 pt]
- State that if were independent continuous random variables, then should hold. [1 pt]
- Identify the contradiction and conclude "not independent". [1 pt]
- Chain B: Higher moments / absolute value method
- Identify the functional relationship , or compute . [1 pt]
- State that under independence, should hold (contradiction), or . [1 pt]
- Compare and conclude "not independent". [1 pt]
- Chain C: Specific region probability method
- Choose a specific region (e.g., ) and compute the actual joint probability (e.g., this region has probability 0 or some non-product value). [1 pt]
- Compute the probability product under the independence assumption . [1 pt]
- Compare and conclude "not independent". [1 pt]
Score exactly one chain.
Total (max 7)
II. Zero-credit items
- Merely listing the normal density formula, the law of total probability, or the independence definition without substituting the problem variables for concrete computation.
- In Part (3), only computing the covariance or the correlation coefficient equals 0, then directly asserting and are independent (even if the computation is correct, no credit is awarded since this is a logical trap).
- In Part (3), merely guessing "not independent" by intuition without mathematical justification.
III. Deductions
- Missing logical justification: In Part (1), if the key property " is symmetric about 0" or "" is not mentioned and the result is stated directly, deduct 1 point.
- Incorrect conclusion: In Part (3), if the final conclusion is " and are independent", that part (3 points) is fully deducted.
- Probability confusion: In Part (3), if is claimed (ignoring the case), leading to subsequent reasoning based on an incorrect value, deduct 1 point.