Question
The random variable has probability density function , . (1) Compute the value of ; (2) Determine the distribution of ; (3) Discuss whether is a continuous random vector.
Step-by-step solution
1. Write the normalization condition and set up the integral Given the density , , the necessary condition for it to be a probability density function is
Substituting :
2. Evaluate the integral via substitution
Let , so and , giving
As ranges from to , ranges from to , so
Using the known result
the normalization condition becomes
3. Solve for the constant
1. Use the one-dimensional transformation formula to find the density
Let , and set , so is the inverse function. Since , takes values on the entire real line, i.e., .
The one-dimensional invertible transformation formula for continuous random variables states: if and is monotone and invertible, then
Here and , so
2. Substitute the known and simplify
From Part 1:
Substituting :
This is precisely the standard normal probability density function.
3. State the conclusion
Therefore follows the standard normal distribution:
In terms of the distribution function: where is the standard normal distribution function.
1. Recall the definition of a continuous two-dimensional random vector
A random vector is called a continuous random vector if there exists a non-negative integrable function such that for any measurable set , and
Under this definition, if exists, then for any set with two-dimensional Lebesgue measure ,
2. Analyze the support of
Let . Then meaning the random vector almost surely satisfies .
Therefore takes values almost entirely on the set i.e.,
However, the set is a smooth curve in the plane; it is a one-dimensional curve in and has two-dimensional Lebesgue measure .
3. Compare with the definition to reach the conclusion
If were a continuous random vector, then for any set with Lebesgue measure , we should have . However, here there exists a set of measure with .
This contradicts the property of continuous random vectors. Therefore: is not a continuous random vector.
Final answer
1. ; 2. , with density ; 3. The values of are almost surely concentrated on the curve , which does not satisfy the definition of a continuous random vector; therefore it is not a continuous random vector.
Marking scheme
The following is the complete marking scheme for this probability theory problem (maximum 7 points).
1. Checkpoints (Total 7 pts)
Part 1: Computing the value of (2 points)
*Note: This part tests the use of integral normalization to find the constant.*
- Setting up the integral and substitution [1 pt]
- Write the normalization condition and perform the substitution (or ), transforming the integral into the Gaussian integral form .
- *Note: If the substitution process is not explicitly shown but the normalization coefficient relationship is correctly identified using the definition of the lognormal distribution, this point may still be awarded.*
- Solving for the result [1 pt]
- Correctly compute .
Part 2: Distribution of (3 points)
*Note: Score exactly one path below | do not add across paths. This part tests the distribution transformation of a function of a random variable.*
- Path A: Density function transformation method
- Jacobian/derivative term [1 pt]: Write the inverse function of the transformation and its derivative (or Jacobian determinant) .
- Substitution and simplification [1 pt]: Correctly substitute and the derivative term into the density transformation formula , and simplify to obtain or .
- Final conclusion [1 pt]: Explicitly state that follows the standard normal distribution , or write the complete standard normal probability density function (with domain ).
- Path B: Distribution function method
- Definition and transformation [1 pt]: Write the distribution function definition .
- Integral substitution [1 pt]: Use the substitution to transform the integration limits and integrand into the standard normal distribution function form .
- Final conclusion [1 pt]: Identify from the integral form that this is the standard normal distribution; conclusion same as Path A.
- Shared prerequisite [max 1 pt]: If the student computed incorrectly in Part 1 but the derivation logic in this part is entirely correct, only the result point is deducted; process points are retained (follow-through).
Part 3: Whether is a continuous random vector (2 points)
*Note: This part tests understanding of the definition of a two-dimensional continuous random vector.*
- Identifying the support / measure [1 pt]
- State that the probability mass of the random vector is concentrated on the plane curve ; or state that its support has two-dimensional Lebesgue measure 0.
- Determination and conclusion [1 pt]
- Based on the above reasoning (measure 0 yet probability 1, or impossibility of writing a two-dimensional probability density ), conclude: it is not a continuous random vector.
Total (max 7)
2. Zero-credit items
- Copying the problem: Merely copying the given conditions or formula names (e.g., "use the density formula") without any concrete substitution or computation.
- Unjustified guess in Part 3: In Part 3, merely answering "yes" or "no" without any mathematical argument.
- Conceptual confusion: In Part 3, arguing "since the marginal distributions of and are both continuous, the joint distribution is also continuous" (this conclusion is false; receives 0 points).
- Incorrect independence assumption: In Part 3, attempting to construct a density via (the problem does not give independence, and in fact the variables are perfectly dependent; this approach receives 0 points).
3. Deductions
*Apply at most one of the following (the most severe); total score cannot go below 0.*
- Computation/arithmetic error (-1 pt):
- Errors in constant handling during integration (e.g., missing , incorrect coefficients), leading to wrong values of or distribution parameters.
- Missing domain (-1 pt):
- When writing the probability density function as the final result, failing to specify the variable range (e.g., or ). However, this deduction is waived if the text explicitly states "follows the standard normal distribution."
- Logical/notational confusion (-1 pt):
- Severely confusing the random variable notation (uppercase ) with the value notation (lowercase ), or writing integration limits with confused logic (e.g., to ), rendering the mathematical expression meaningless.