Question
A random variable has probability density function , . (1) Compute the value of ; (2) Determine the distribution of ; (3) Discuss whether is a continuous random vector.
Step-by-step solution
1. Write the normalization condition and set up the integral The given density is and the necessary condition for it to be a probability density function is
Substituting :
2. Evaluate the integral via substitution
Let , so and . Then
As ranges from to , ranges from to , so
It is well known that
Therefore the normalization condition becomes
3. Solve for the constant
Hence .
1. Use the one-dimensional transformation formula to find the density
Let , and write , so is the inverse function. Since , the range of is the entire real line, i.e., .
The transformation formula for a continuous random variable under a monotone invertible map states: if and is monotone and invertible, then
Here and , so
2. Substitute the known and simplify
From Part (1),
Substituting :
This is precisely the probability density function of the standard normal distribution.
3. State the conclusion
Therefore follows the standard normal distribution, i.e.,
In terms of the distribution function, where denotes the standard normal distribution function.
1. Recall the definition of a continuous (bivariate) random vector
A random vector is called a continuous random vector if there exists a nonnegative integrable function such that for every measurable set , and
Under this definition, for any set of planar Lebesgue measure zero,
2. Analyze the support of
Let . Then meaning the random vector almost surely satisfies .
Therefore takes values almost entirely within the set i.e.,
However, the set is a smooth curve in the plane; it is a one-dimensional curve in and has two-dimensional Lebesgue measure zero.
3. Compare with the definition to reach the conclusion
If were a continuous random vector, then for any set of Lebesgue measure zero we would have . Yet here there exists a measure-zero set with .
This contradicts the property of continuous random vectors. Therefore: is not a continuous random vector.
Final answer
1. ; 2. , with density ; 3. The values of are almost surely concentrated on the curve , which does not satisfy the definition of a continuous random vector; therefore it is not a continuous random vector.
Marking scheme
The following is the marking rubric based on the official solution (total: 7 points).
1. Checkpoints (Total 7 pts)
Part 1: Computing the value of (2 pts)
- Setting up the integral and substitution [1 pt]
- Write the normalization condition , and perform the variable substitution (or ), transforming the integral into the Gaussian integral form .
- *Note: If the substitution process is not explicitly shown but the log-normal distribution definition is directly used to correctly identify the normalization coefficient, this point is also awarded.*
- Obtaining the result [1 pt]
- Correctly compute .
Part 2: Computing the distribution of (3 pts)
*Note: Score exactly one path below; do not add points across paths.*
- Path A: Density function transformation method
- Jacobian / derivative term [1 pt]: Write the inverse function of the transformation and its derivative (or Jacobian determinant) .
- Substitution and simplification [1 pt]: Correctly substitute and the derivative term into the density transformation formula , and simplify to obtain or .
- Final conclusion [1 pt]: Explicitly state that follows the standard normal distribution , or write the complete standard normal probability density function (with domain ).
- Path B: Distribution function method
- Definition and conversion [1 pt]: Write the distribution function definition .
- Integral substitution [1 pt]: Use the substitution to transform the limits and integrand into the standard normal distribution function form .
- Final conclusion [1 pt]: Identify the integral form as the standard normal distribution; conclusion same as Path A.
- Shared prerequisite [max 1 pt]: If the student made an error in Part 1 leading to an incorrect value of , but the derivation logic in this part is entirely correct, only the result point is deducted; process points are retained (follow-through).
Part 3: Discussing whether is a continuous random vector (2 pts)
- Identifying the support set / measure [1 pt]
- State that the probability mass of the random vector is concentrated on the plane curve ; or state that its support set has two-dimensional Lebesgue measure zero.
- Determination and conclusion [1 pt]
- Based on the above reasoning (measure zero yet probability 1, or impossibility of writing a bivariate probability density function ), conclude: it is not a continuous random vector.
Total (max 7)
2. Zero-credit items
- Copying the problem: Merely copying the given conditions or formula names (e.g., "use the density formula") without any concrete substitution or computation.
- No justification in Part 3: In Part 3, answering only "yes" or "no" without any mathematical argument.
- Conceptual confusion: In Part 3, arguing "because the marginal distributions of and are both continuous, the joint distribution is also continuous" (this conclusion is false; award 0 pts).
- Incorrectly assuming independence: In Part 3, attempting to construct a density function via (the problem does not give independence, and the variables are in fact perfectly dependent; this approach receives 0 pts).
3. Deductions
*Apply at most one most severe deduction; total score shall not fall below 0.*
- Computational / arithmetic error (-1 pt):
- Errors in constant handling during integration (e.g., omitting , miscalculating coefficients), leading to an incorrect final value of or distribution parameters.
- Missing domain specification (-1 pt):
- When writing the probability density function expression as a final result, failing to specify the variable range (e.g., or ); however, this deduction is waived if the text explicitly states "follows the standard normal distribution."
- Logical / notational confusion (-1 pt):
- Severely confusing random variable notation (uppercase ) with value notation (lowercase ), or writing integration limits with confused logic (e.g., to ), rendering the mathematical expression meaningless.