Question
Let be a martingale or a nonnegative submartingale. Prove that there exists a constant such that:
where .
Step-by-step solution
Step 1. Let Since is a martingale or a nonnegative submartingale, is a nonnegative submartingale. Using the integral formula for the expectation of a nonnegative random variable:
Step 2. By Doob's maximal inequality, for any : Substituting into the integral: Using Fubini's theorem to interchange the integral and expectation, and noting that when : Thus:
Step 3. Introduce the inequality: for any , Proof: let , then . Setting gives , at which attains its minimum . Hence , i.e., When , taking : When , , so the inequality holds trivially. Taking expectations:
Step 4. Substituting Step 3 into Step 2: Rearranging (if is finite, or via a truncation argument): Solving: Since , taking completes the proof.
Final answer
QED.
Marking scheme
The following is the detailed rubric for this problem:
1. Checkpoints (Total 7)
Score exactly one chain; if multiple paths exist, take the highest score; do not add points across chains.
Chain A: Classical Integration Method (Official Solution Path)
- Integral representation and maximal inequality (3 pts total) [additive]
- Use the tail probability integral formula to represent the expectation, with a reasonable splitting (e.g., ) [1 pt]
- Correctly cite and substitute Doob's maximal inequality: [1 pt]
- Use Fubini's theorem to interchange the order of integration, computing the intermediate result with the logarithmic term (i.e., deriving or equivalent form) [1 pt]
- Decoupling via inequality (3 pts total) [additive]
- Core step: Introduce or prove a specific algebraic inequality (such as ); this inequality must produce a coefficient for the linear term to enable rearrangement [2 pts]
- Note: If only using the ordinary Young inequality leading to a coefficient for (which cannot be eliminated), these 2 pts are not awarded.
- Substitute the random variables and into the above inequality, successfully separating and [1 pt]
- Conclusion and simplification (1 pt total) [additive]
- Rearrange by combining the terms (e.g., handling the coefficient ), solve for the final inequality, and identify the existence of the constant [1 pt]
2. Zero-credit items
- Only writing out the final statement of Doob's inequality without providing any proof derivation (treated as recitation rather than proof).
- Only listing definitions of martingales, submartingales, or variables given in the problem, without substantive derivation.
- Attempting to derive via norm () boundedness without proving the limiting behavior or constant control as .
3. Deductions
- Integration interval error: When handling , failing to truncate at (or ), causing to diverge at or unclear logic. -1 pt
- Missing symbol definition: Not handling the definition of (e.g., directly taking logarithm of values less than 1 without noting it equals 0). -1 pt
- Coefficient computation error: In the algebraic inequality step, coefficient computation error that, despite correct approach, leads to a negative or meaningless constant . -1 pt
- Circular reasoning: Using the conclusion to be proved, or a stronger unproved conclusion, in the proof. Deduct to 0 pts.