Question
Under probability measure , let be a Markov chain on state space with transition kernel and invariant distribution . Define a subset-valued Markov chain by: given , sample independently and set Let denote the law of , and let . Prove
Step-by-step solution
Step 1. For any fixed subset , define Because is invariant, .
Step 2. From the update rule with , Taking expectation over ,
Step 3. Define Then the relation above becomes This is exactly the Chapman-Kolmogorov recursion.
Step 4. Initial condition: when , , so Hence, by induction on , for all , proving the claim.
Final answer
QED.
Marking scheme
Checkpoints (max 7 points)
Global grading policy
- Award credit for a logically complete argument, not for isolated formulas.
- If multiple valid derivations are provided, score the best coherent path.
- Deduct only for genuine logical gaps (missing conditioning, unjustified limits, or incorrect use of invariance).
Part A: One-step update law (2 points)
- Correctly define
\[
a_S(y)=\frac{\sum_{z\in S}\pi(z)p(z,y)}{\pi(y)}
\]
for fixed , and justify from stationarity of . [1 pt]
- Derive the conditional update probability from the uniform-threshold rule:
\[
P(y\in S_{t+1}\mid S_t=S)=a_S(y).
\]
[1 pt]
Part B: Recursion for the membership probability (2 points)
- Condition on , then average over to obtain
\[
P(y\in S_{t+1}\mid S_0=\{x\})
=\sum_{z\in\Omega} p(z,y)\,P(z\in S_t\mid S_0=\{x\}).
\]
[1 pt]
- Introduce
\[
H_t(x,y):=\frac{\pi(y)}{\pi(x)}P(y\in S_t\mid S_0=\{x\})
\]
and derive the linear recursion
\[
H_{t+1}(x,y)=\sum_{z\in\Omega}H_t(x,z)p(z,y).
\]
[1 pt]
Part C: Identification with the -step transition kernel (3 points)
- Verify the initial condition:
\[
H_0(x,y)=\mathbf 1_{\{x=y\}}=P^0(x,y).
\]
[1 pt]
- Use induction (or uniqueness of the forward equation solution in discrete time) to conclude
\[
H_t(x,y)=P^t(x,y),\qquad t\ge0.
\]
[1 pt]
- Rearranging gives the target identity:
\[
P(y\in S_t\mid S_0=\{x\})=\frac{\pi(x)}{\pi(y)}P^t(x,y).
\]
[1 pt]
Common deductions
- Missing normalization by in : deduct up to 1 point.
- Writing a recursion without conditioning/averaging correctly: deduct 1 point.
- Claiming the final identity without checking base step or induction: deduct 1 point.
- Algebraic slips that do not change the method: small deduction (0.25–0.5 point).