Question
Let be a one-dimensional standard Brownian motion. Determine whether the location of the maximum of on is unique.
Step-by-step solution
Let where is standard Brownian motion. We show that the maximizer of on is almost surely unique.
Step 1. Define the event For standard Brownian motion without drift, it is classical that
Step 2. On the finite horizon , the law of is absolutely continuous with respect to the law of (Cameron--Martin/Girsanov transform). In particular, for any measurable path event , Therefore zero-probability path events are preserved under adding deterministic drift .
Step 3. Let be the event that the maximum is achieved at two or more distinct times. Under Brownian law, . By measure equivalence on , this implies Hence
Step 4 (equivalent geometric intuition). A tie of maxima would require a nontrivial flat-top phenomenon after subtracting a deterministic linear function. Brownian paths almost surely have no such plateau at their global maximum on a compact interval; the drift term does not create plateaus because it is smooth and strictly deterministic.
Therefore, the location of the maximum of on is almost surely unique.
Equivalent viewpoint (argmax law): the maximizer of Brownian motion with deterministic drift over a compact interval has a continuous distribution and therefore no atoms. In particular, which is consistent with almost-sure uniqueness of the maximizer.
Final answer
Unique.
Marking scheme
The following is the rubric for this problem.
I. Checkpoints (max 7 pts)
Select the highest-scoring path; do not combine across paths.
Path A: Girsanov / Measure Equivalence (Official Solution)
- Baseline property: State that the maximizer of on is a.s. unique. [2 pts]
- Core theorem: Cite Cameron--Martin--Girsanov and state on . [3 pts]
- Deduction and conclusion: Use measure equivalence to transfer the a.s. uniqueness. [2 pts]
Path B: General Theory
- Cite general theorem for continuous processes with a.s. unique maximizer. [5 pts]
- Verify conditions and conclude. [2 pts]
Total (max 7)
II. Zero-credit items
- Attempting differentiation ().
- Answering without justification.
- Answering "not unique."
III. Deductions
- Missing "almost surely" [-1].
- Confusing distribution equivalence with measure equivalence [-2].