Apply SAS, ASA, SSS, AAS, and HL to prove triangles congruent. Understand each condition and avoid common misconceptions.
Two sides and the included angle are equal
Two angles and the included side are equal
All three corresponding sides are equal
Two angles and a non-included side are equal
Right triangles with equal hypotenuse and one leg are congruent
SSA generally does not determine a unique triangle (ambiguous case). Two non-congruent triangles can satisfy SSA with the given data.
Show SAS implies a rigid motion mapping one triangle to another.
Translate a vertex to coincide, rotate to align included angle, and reflect if needed to match orientation; equal included sides fix position → triangles coincide.
Given side a, side b adjacent to angle opposite a, with : two distinct triangles may exist if vs (none/one/two solutions).
Use the Law of Sines setup to illustrate multiple possible heights to side b.
HL requires right triangles (a 90° angle), equal hypotenuse, and one equal leg. Without a right angle, HL does not apply.
, , . Decide if △ABC ≅ △DEF and justify.
Yes, by SAS: two sides and included angle are equal → triangles are congruent.
1) Which criterion fits: AB=DE, BC=EF, AC=DF?
2) Right triangles with hypotenuse and one leg equal?
3) Give a counterexample to SSA guaranteeing congruence.