MathIsimple
Course 2

Sequences and Limits

Section 1: Sequences and ε-N Definition

Definition 1.1: Sequence

A sequence is a function f:NRf: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}. We denote it as {xn}n=1\{x_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty} or simply {xn}\{x_n\}, where xn=f(n)x_n = f(n).

Definition 1.2: Limit of a Sequence (ε-N Definition)

We say limnxn=a\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = a (or xnax_n \to a) if:

ε>0,NN:n>N,xna<ε\forall \varepsilon > 0, \exists N \in \mathbb{N}: \forall n > N, |x_n - a| < \varepsilon

In words: For every positive tolerance ε, there exists a natural number N such that all terms after the Nth term are within ε of a.

Theorem 1.1: Uniqueness of Limits

If a sequence converges, then its limit is unique.

Proof of Theorem 1.1:

Suppose limnxn=a\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = a and limnxn=b\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = b with aba \neq b.

Let ϵ=ab2>0\epsilon = \frac{|a-b|}{2} > 0.

By definition:

  • N1\exists N_1: n>N1xna<ϵn > N_1 \Rightarrow |x_n - a| < \epsilon
  • N2\exists N_2: n>N2xnb<ϵn > N_2 \Rightarrow |x_n - b| < \epsilon

For n>max{N1,N2}n > \max\{N_1, N_2\}:

ab=axn+xnbaxn+xnb<2ϵ=ab|a - b| = |a - x_n + x_n - b| \leq |a - x_n| + |x_n - b| < 2\epsilon = |a - b|

This gives ab<ab|a - b| < |a - b|, a contradiction. Therefore a=ba = b.

Example 1.1: Basic Limit

Prove: limn1n=0\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n} = 0

Proof:

Given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, we need to find NN such that for n>Nn > N:

1n0=1n<ϵ\left|\frac{1}{n} - 0\right| = \frac{1}{n} < \epsilon

This is equivalent to n>1ϵn > \frac{1}{\epsilon}.

Choose N=1ϵ+1N = \left\lfloor \frac{1}{\epsilon} \right\rfloor + 1.

For n>Nn > N: 1n<1N<ϵ\frac{1}{n} < \frac{1}{N} < \epsilon. ∎

Example 1.2: Rational Function

Prove: limn2n+1n+3=2\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{2n+1}{n+3} = 2

Proof:

We compute:

2n+1n+32=2n+12(n+3)n+3=5n+3=5n+3\left|\frac{2n+1}{n+3} - 2\right| = \left|\frac{2n+1 - 2(n+3)}{n+3}\right| = \left|\frac{-5}{n+3}\right| = \frac{5}{n+3}

Given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, we need 5n+3<ϵ\frac{5}{n+3} < \epsilon, i.e., n>5ϵ3n > \frac{5}{\epsilon} - 3.

Choose N=max(0,5ϵ3+1)N = \max\left(0, \left\lfloor \frac{5}{\epsilon} - 3 \right\rfloor + 1\right).

For n>Nn > N: 5n+3<ϵ\frac{5}{n+3} < \epsilon. ∎

Section 2: Limit Properties

Theorem 2.1: Boundedness of Convergent Sequences

If {xn}\{x_n\} converges, then {xn}\{x_n\} is bounded.

Proof of Theorem 2.1:

Let limnxn=L\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = L. Take ϵ=1\epsilon = 1.

N\exists N: n>NxnL<1xn<L+1n > N \Rightarrow |x_n - L| < 1 \Rightarrow |x_n| < |L| + 1

Let M=max{x1,x2,,xN,L+1}M = \max\{|x_1|, |x_2|, \ldots, |x_N|, |L| + 1\}.

Then xnM|x_n| \leq M for all nn.

Theorem 2.2: Limit Laws

Let limnxn=a\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = a and limnyn=b\lim_{n \to \infty} y_n = b. Then:

  • lim(xn+yn)=a+b\lim(x_n + y_n) = a + b
  • lim(xnyn)=ab\lim(x_n \cdot y_n) = a \cdot b
  • limxnyn=ab\lim\frac{x_n}{y_n} = \frac{a}{b} (if b0b \neq 0)
  • lim(cxn)=ca\lim(cx_n) = ca for any constant cc
Proof of Sum Rule:

We show lim(xn+yn)=a+b\lim(x_n + y_n) = a + b.

Given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0:

  • N1\exists N_1: n>N1xna<ϵ2n > N_1 \Rightarrow |x_n - a| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}
  • N2\exists N_2: n>N2ynb<ϵ2n > N_2 \Rightarrow |y_n - b| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}

Let N=max(N1,N2)N = \max(N_1, N_2). For n>Nn > N:

(xn+yn)(a+b)xna+ynb<ϵ2+ϵ2=ϵ|(x_n + y_n) - (a + b)| \leq |x_n - a| + |y_n - b| < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon
Example 2.1: Applying Limit Laws

Find: limn3n2+2n12n2n+5\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{3n^2 + 2n - 1}{2n^2 - n + 5}

Solution:

Divide numerator and denominator by n2n^2:

limn3+2n1n221n+5n2\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{3 + \frac{2}{n} - \frac{1}{n^2}}{2 - \frac{1}{n} + \frac{5}{n^2}}

Using limit laws:

=3+0020+0=32= \frac{3 + 0 - 0}{2 - 0 + 0} = \frac{3}{2}

Section 3: Squeeze Theorem

Theorem 3.1: Squeeze Theorem (Sandwich Theorem)

Let {an}\{a_n\}, {bn}\{b_n\}, {cn}\{c_n\} be sequences satisfying:

  1. N0N\exists N_0 \in \mathbb{N}: anbncna_n \leq b_n \leq c_n for all nN0n \geq N_0
  2. limnan=L=limncn\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = L = \lim_{n \to \infty} c_n

Then limnbn=L\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = L.

Proof of Theorem 3.1:

Given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0:

  • N1\exists N_1: n>N1anL<ϵLϵ<ann > N_1 \Rightarrow |a_n - L| < \epsilon \Rightarrow L - \epsilon < a_n
  • N2\exists N_2: n>N2cnL<ϵcn<L+ϵn > N_2 \Rightarrow |c_n - L| < \epsilon \Rightarrow c_n < L + \epsilon

For n>max{N0,N1,N2}n > \max\{N_0, N_1, N_2\}:

Lϵ<anbncn<L+ϵL - \epsilon < a_n \leq b_n \leq c_n < L + \epsilon

Therefore bnL<ϵ|b_n - L| < \epsilon.

Example 3.1: Using Squeeze Theorem

Find: limnsinnn\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\sin n}{n}

Solution:

We have 1sinn1-1 \leq \sin n \leq 1, so:

1nsinnn1n-\frac{1}{n} \leq \frac{\sin n}{n} \leq \frac{1}{n}

Since 1n0-\frac{1}{n} \to 0 and 1n0\frac{1}{n} \to 0, by Squeeze Theorem:

limnsinnn=0\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\sin n}{n} = 0

Section 4: Monotone Bounded Theorem

Definition 4.1: Monotone Sequence

A sequence {an}\{a_n\} is:

  • Monotonically increasing if anan+1a_n \leq a_{n+1} for all nn
  • Monotonically decreasing if anan+1a_n \geq a_{n+1} for all nn
Theorem 4.1: Monotone Bounded Theorem

A bounded monotone sequence converges.

Proof of Theorem 4.1 (Increasing Case):

Let E={an:nN}E = \{a_n : n \in \mathbb{N}\}. Since EE is non-empty and bounded above, by the Completeness Axiom, α=supE\alpha = \sup E exists.

We claim limnan=α\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = \alpha.

Given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0:

  • By supremum property: N\exists N such that aN>αϵa_N > \alpha - \epsilon
  • By monotonicity: n>NanaN>αϵn > N \Rightarrow a_n \geq a_N > \alpha - \epsilon
  • By upper bound: anα<α+ϵa_n \leq \alpha < \alpha + \epsilon

Therefore anα<ϵ|a_n - \alpha| < \epsilon for n>Nn > N.

Example 4.1: The Number e

Prove: The sequence xn=(1+1n)nx_n = (1 + \frac{1}{n})^n converges.

Solution:

One can show that {xn}\{x_n\} is strictly increasing and bounded above by 3.

By the Monotone Bounded Theorem, it converges. The limit is denoted ee:

e=limn(1+1n)n2.71828...e = \lim_{n \to \infty} \left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right)^n \approx 2.71828...

Section 5: Subsequences and Bolzano-Weierstrass

Definition 5.1: Subsequence

Let {an}\{a_n\} be a sequence. If {nk}N\{n_k\} \subset \mathbb{N} with n1<n2<n3<n_1 < n_2 < n_3 < \cdots, then {ank}\{a_{n_k}\} is a subsequence of {an}\{a_n\}.

Theorem 5.1: Subsequence Convergence

{an}\{a_n\} converges to aa \Leftrightarrow Every subsequence of {an}\{a_n\} converges to aa.

Theorem 5.2: Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem

Every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence.

Proof of Theorem 5.2:

Method: Every sequence has a monotone subsequence (by peak argument). Since the original is bounded, the monotone subsequence is bounded, hence converges by Monotone Bounded Theorem.

Example 5.1: Divergence via Subsequences

Prove: {(1)n}\{(-1)^n\} diverges.

{a2k}=1,1,1,1\{a_{2k}\} = 1, 1, 1, \ldots \to 1

{a2k1}=1,1,1,1\{a_{2k-1}\} = -1, -1, -1, \ldots \to -1

Since 111 \neq -1, the sequence diverges.

Section 6: Cauchy Sequences

Definition 6.1: Cauchy Sequence

A sequence {an}\{a_n\} is a Cauchy sequence if:

ϵ>0,NN,n,m>N:anam<ϵ\forall \epsilon > 0, \exists N \in \mathbb{N}, \forall n, m > N: |a_n - a_m| < \epsilon
Theorem 6.1: Cauchy Criterion

A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if it is a Cauchy sequence.

Proof of Theorem 6.1 (Necessity):

Let liman=L\lim a_n = L. Given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, N\exists N: n>NanL<ϵ2n > N \Rightarrow |a_n - L| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}.

For n,m>Nn, m > N:

anamanL+Lam<ϵ2+ϵ2=ϵ|a_n - a_m| \leq |a_n - L| + |L - a_m| < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon
Example 6.1: Harmonic Series is NOT Cauchy

Show: Hn=k=1n1kH_n = \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} is not Cauchy.

Solution:

H2nHn=k=n+12n1k>n12n=12|H_{2n} - H_n| = \sum_{k=n+1}^{2n} \frac{1}{k} > n \cdot \frac{1}{2n} = \frac{1}{2}

This violates the Cauchy criterion, so the harmonic series diverges.

Section 7: Nested Interval Theorem

Theorem 7.1: Cantor's Nested Interval Theorem

If {[an,bn]}\{[a_n, b_n]\} is a sequence of closed intervals with:

  1. [an,bn][an+1,bn+1][a_n, b_n] \supseteq [a_{n+1}, b_{n+1}] for all nn
  2. limn(bnan)=0\lim_{n \to \infty} (b_n - a_n) = 0

Then !ξR\exists!\, \xi \in \mathbb{R}: {ξ}=n=1[an,bn]\{\xi\} = \bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty} [a_n, b_n]

Proof of Theorem 7.1:

The sequence {an}\{a_n\} is increasing and bounded above by b1b_1, so it converges to some ξ\xi.

Similarly, {bn}\{b_n\} is decreasing and bounded below, converging to the same ξ\xi (since bnan0b_n - a_n \to 0).

Therefore ξ[an,bn]\xi \in [a_n, b_n] for all nn, and is unique.

Example 7.1: Bisection Method

Application: The bisection method for finding roots uses nested intervals. Each step halves the interval, and the intersection gives the root.

Practice Quiz: Sequences and Limits
10
Questions
0
Correct
0%
Accuracy
1
Which of the following sequences is convergent?
Easy
Not attempted
2
The ε-N definition states: limnxn=a\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = a if and only if...
Easy
Not attempted
3
If limxn=a\lim x_n = a and limyn=b\lim y_n = b, then lim(xn+yn)\lim(x_n + y_n) equals:
Easy
Not attempted
4
The Squeeze Theorem applies when:
Medium
Not attempted
5
A bounded monotone sequence:
Medium
Not attempted
6
If xnyn|x_n| \leq y_n and limyn=0\lim y_n = 0, what is limxn\lim x_n?
Medium
Not attempted
7
The sequence xn=(1+1n)nx_n = (1 + \frac{1}{n})^n converges to:
Hard
Not attempted
8
If lim(xn+yn)\lim(x_n + y_n) exists and limxn\lim x_n exists, must limyn\lim y_n exist?
Hard
Not attempted
9
What's wrong with: 'xn<1x_n < 1 for all n, so limxn<1\lim x_n < 1'?
Hard
Not attempted
10
The Stolz Theorem is useful for:
Hard
Not attempted

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do we need the ε-N definition?

The ε-N definition provides a rigorous framework for limits, eliminating ambiguity. It allows us to prove statements about limits with certainty and handle edge cases that intuitive approaches miss.

What's the intuition behind ε-N?

Think of ε as a tolerance level - how close we want the sequence to be to the limit. N is the starting point after which all terms are within this tolerance. The definition says: no matter how tight we make the tolerance, we can always find a point after which all terms satisfy it.

Can a sequence have more than one limit?

No! If a sequence converges, its limit is unique. This is a fundamental theorem that we prove using the ε-N definition.

What's the difference between bounded and convergent?

Convergent implies bounded, but the converse is false. The sequence {(-1)^n} is bounded but divergent because it oscillates. However, every convergent sequence must be bounded.

How do I choose the right N in a proof?

Work backwards: start with |xₙ - a| < ε and algebraically solve for what condition on n makes this true. The resulting expression tells you how to choose N, often using floor functions or adding 1 to ensure N is a natural number.