Let be defined on some punctured neighborhood . We say if and only if:
If and , then .
Suppose . Let .
By the limit definitions, such that for : .
Let . Take any x with .
By triangle inequality:
Contradiction! Therefore . ∎
Prove:
Proof:
Given , choose .
If , then:
Therefore the limit is 5. ∎
Prove:
Proof:
We have .
If , then , so .
Given , choose .
If , then:
Therefore the limit is 9. ∎
Let f be defined on U'(x₀, δ₀). Then:
Show: does not exist.
Proof:
Consider sequences and .
Both converge to 0, but and .
By Heine's theorem, the limit does not exist. ∎
We say if:
We say if:
Let be defined on an interval containing . We say is continuous at if:
Equivalently:
Prove: is continuous at .
Proof:
We have and .
Since the limit equals the function value, f is continuous at 1. ∎
exists, but ≠ (or undefined).
Both and exist, but are unequal.
At least one one-sided limit doesn't exist (infinite or oscillating).
For :
is undefined at , but .
This is a removable discontinuity.
If and , then:
If near and:
Then .
Find:
Solution: Since :
Since and as , by Squeeze Theorem:
If exists, then is bounded in some neighborhood of .
Take . Then such that:
Therefore for .
If , then there exists such that for all with .
Similarly, if , then near .
If , then for sufficiently close to 0, we have .
The condition excludes x = x₀. The limit describes behavior as x approaches x₀, not the value at x₀. The function may not even be defined at x₀.
For sequences, N is discrete (natural number). For functions, δ measures continuous distance. Heine's theorem bridges them.
Work backwards: start with |f(x) - L| < ε, manipulate to get |x - x₀| < something. That 'something' becomes your δ.
f(x₀) is defined, lim_{x→x₀} f(x) exists, and lim_{x→x₀} f(x) = f(x₀). All three must hold.
Two-sided limit exists iff both one-sided limits exist and are equal. Continuity requires the two-sided limit to equal f(x₀).