Understand removable singularities, poles, essential singularities, and learn methods for computing residues with the powerful residue theorem.
Draw small circles around each singularity . By the deformation theorem and Cauchy's integral formula applied to the Laurent expansion:
Problem: Find the residue of at .
Solution:
This is a pole of order 2. Using the formula with :
Problem: Find all residues of .
Solution:
Singularities: simple pole at , pole of order 2 at .
At (simple pole):
At (pole of order 2):
Problem: Evaluate .
Solution:
Singularities: , both inside .
Using the formula: ,
By residue theorem:
Problem: Find the residue of at .
Solution:
This is a pole of order 2. Using :
The coefficient of is 0, so .
Problem: Classify the singularity at for .
Solution:
Using
The Laurent series has infinitely many negative powers, so is an essential singularity.
Suppose not. Then there exists and such that for all near .
Then is bounded near , so is either removable or a pole. But this contradicts being an essential singularity.
Problem: Find the residue of f(z) = \frac{z^2 + 1}{(z-1)^3(z+2)}} at .
Solution:
This is a pole of order 3. Let
Then
At :
So
Problem: Show that is an essential singularity of .
Solution:
Using :
This has infinitely many negative powers, so is an essential singularity.
Problem: Find the residue at infinity for .
Solution:
The residue at infinity is defined as
for
The coefficient of is 0, so
For simple poles: . For poles of order : use the derivative formula. For rational functions where and : .
Check the Laurent series: no negative powers = removable, finitely many = pole (order = highest negative power), infinitely many = essential. Also check limits: removable if limit exists, pole if limit is infinity, essential if limit doesn't exist.
Essential singularities have bizarre behavior (Casorati-Weierstrass). The function oscillates wildly and takes values arbitrarily close to any complex number near the singularity.
Problem: Find the residue of at .
Solution:
Using :
The coefficient of corresponds to :
Therefore, .
Problem: Find all residues of .
Solution:
Singularities: and for integers (zeros of ).
At (), has simple poles, so has simple poles with residues computed using L'Hôpital's rule.
At , expand , so
Therefore, .
Problem: Show that if has a pole of order at , then has a zero of order at .
Solution:
If has a pole of order , then where and is analytic.
Then , and since , is analytic at .
Therefore has a zero of order at .
Problem: Find the order of the zero of at .
Solution:
The first non-zero term is , so is a zero of order 3.
Problem: Find the residue of at .
Solution:
This is a pole of order 2. Let
Therefore:
Problem: Classify the singularity at for .
Solution:
Using :
The Laurent series has no negative powers, so is a removable singularity.
Problem: Find all residues of .
Solution:
Singularities: and for integers .
At (), simple poles with residues computed using L'Hôpital's rule.
At , expand , so , showing a pole of order 2.
Problem: Determine the type of singularity at for .
Solution:
Using :
No negative powers, so is a removable singularity.
Problem: Find the residue at for .
Solution:
Using :
Therefore, (coefficient of ).
Problem: Show that if has a pole of order at , then is analytic at and .
Solution:
If has a pole of order , then where and is analytic.
Then , which is analytic at and .
Problem: Find all residues of .
Solution:
Singularities: (pole of order 3) and for (simple poles).
At , the residue is .
At , expand to find the Laurent series and extract the residue.
Problem: Classify the singularity at for .
Solution:
Using :
No negative powers, so is a removable singularity.
Problem: Find the residue at for .
Solution:
Using :
The coefficient of is , so .
Problem: Find all residues of f(z) = \frac{z^2 + 1}{z^3(z-1)}}.
Solution:
Singularities: (pole of order 3) and (simple pole).
At :
At : Use the derivative formula to compute the residue at the pole of order 3.
Problem: Find the residue at for .
Solution:
This is a pole of order 3. Let
Problem: Show that if has an essential singularity at , then does not exist.
Solution:
By Casorati-Weierstrass theorem, takes values arbitrarily close to any complex number near .
If the limit existed, would be bounded near , contradicting the essential singularity behavior.
Problem: Find the residue at for .
Solution:
Using :
Therefore, .
Problem: Show that if has a removable singularity at , then exists and is finite.
Solution:
If is a removable singularity, then the Laurent series has no negative powers, so can be defined at to be analytic there.
By continuity of analytic functions, the limit exists and equals .
Problem: Find all residues of .
Solution:
Singularities: (each is a pole of order 2).
At :
Computing gives and .
Problem: Use Casorati-Weierstrass theorem to show that takes values arbitrarily close to any complex number in any neighborhood of .
Solution:
The function has an essential singularity at (its Laurent series has infinitely many negative powers).
By Casorati-Weierstrass theorem, for any and any , there exists with such that for any .
To see this explicitly, consider sequences approaching 0 from different directions:
For :
For :
By choosing appropriate sequences, we can make approach any complex number.
Problem: Show that if has an essential singularity at , then cannot be bounded in any deleted neighborhood of .
Solution:
Suppose for all in some deleted neighborhood of .
Consider for some . If is bounded away from , then would be bounded.
However, by Casorati-Weierstrass, takes values arbitrarily close to any , so cannot be bounded.
This contradiction shows that cannot be bounded in any deleted neighborhood of an essential singularity.
This is a stronger statement than Casorati-Weierstrass: not only does take values dense in , but it's also unbounded.
A pole is when the Laurent series has finitely many negative powers (the principal part is a finite sum). An essential singularity has infinitely many negative powers. Poles have limits that approach infinity, while essential singularities exhibit chaotic behavior (Casorati-Weierstrass theorem).
For a pole of order $m$ at $z_0$, use: $\text{Res}(f,z_0) = \frac{1}{(m-1)!}\lim_{z\to z_0} \frac{d^{m-1}}{dz^{m-1}}[(z-z_0)^m f(z)]$. For simple poles ($m=1$), this simplifies to $\lim_{z\to z_0} (z-z_0)f(z)$.
The residue theorem allows evaluation of contour integrals by summing residues at enclosed singularities: $\oint_C f(z)dz = 2\pi i \sum \text{Res}(f,z_k)$. This is especially powerful for evaluating real integrals by converting them to complex contour integrals.
A removable singularity is one where the Laurent expansion has no negative powers. The function can be made analytic by appropriately defining its value at that point. Example: $\sin z/z$ has a removable singularity at $z=0$.
For simple poles: $\text{Res}(f,z_0) = \lim_{z\to z_0} (z-z_0)f(z)$. For poles of order $m$: use the derivative formula. For functions of the form $g(z)/h(z)$ where $h(z_0)=0$ and $h'(z_0)\neq 0$: $\text{Res} = g(z_0)/h'(z_0)$.