Before starting this course, you should be familiar with:
Fundamental definitions and properties
Let be a measurable space. A function is called measurable if for every , the set
is measurable (i.e., belongs to ).
Note: This definition is equivalent to requiring that is measurable for all Borel sets , or for all open sets .
A function is called a simple function if it takes only finitely many distinct values. That is, there exist distinct real numbers and measurable sets such that
where is the characteristic function of .
A property is said to hold almost everywhere (abbreviated a.e.) if it holds except possibly on a set of measure zero.
Two functions and are said to be equal almost everywhere if is a null set.
Let and be measurable functions. Then:
Proof:
(1) For any , we have
Since and are measurable, each set in the union is measurable, and a countable union of measurable sets is measurable.
(2) Note that . Since squares and differences of measurable functions are measurable, the result follows.
(3) and .
(4) .
(5) , which can be written as a countable union similar to (1). ∎
If is a sequence of measurable functions and pointwise (or pointwise a.e.), then is measurable.
Proof:
For any , we have
This expresses the limit superior condition: if and only if there exists such that for all , there exists with .
Since each is measurable, and measurable sets are closed under countable unions and intersections, the result follows. ∎
Let be a nonnegative measurable function. Then there exists an increasing sequence of simple functions such that pointwise.
Proof:
For each , define
where
Each is a simple function, the sequence is increasing, and pointwise. ∎
Let be a measure space with . Suppose is a sequence of measurable functions and pointwise a.e. Then for every , there exists a measurable set such that and uniformly on .
Proof:
For , define
Since pointwise a.e., for each , we have .
By continuity of measure, for each , there exists such that .
Let . Then , and on , we have uniform convergence. ∎
Let be a measurable function on that is finite a.e. on a measurable set of finite measure. Then for every , there exists a closed set with , , and is continuous on .
Proof:
First approximate by a simple function such that except on a set of small measure.
Then approximate each characteristic function in by continuous functions using regularity of measure.
Finally, use Tietze's extension theorem to extend the continuous function to the closed set. The details involve careful approximation and measure theory techniques. ∎
Problem: Show that the characteristic function of a measurable set is measurable.
Solution:
For any , we have
Since and are measurable, is measurable.
Problem: Construct a simple function approximation for on .
Solution:
Using the construction in Theorem 2.3 with , we partition into intervals of length :
This gives a step function approximation that increases as increases, converging to .
The collection of measurable functions forms a vector space and an algebra over .
Let be measurable and be Borel measurable (i.e., is Borel for all Borel sets ). Then the composition is measurable.
In particular, if is continuous, then is measurable.
Proof:
For any Borel set , we have
Since is Borel measurable, is a Borel set. Since is measurable, is measurable.
Therefore, is measurable for all Borel sets , which implies is measurable.
If is continuous, then is Borel measurable (since continuous functions map Borel sets to Borel sets), so the result follows. ∎
Let be a nonnegative measurable function. For each , define the simple function by:
Then is an increasing sequence of simple functions converging pointwise to , and the convergence is uniform on any set where is bounded.
Proof:
For each , the function takes only finitely many values (at most values), so it is simple.
To show the sequence is increasing, fix and . If , then and , so .
If , then for some . Since the partition at step is finer, we have .
For pointwise convergence, fix . If , then . If , then for large , we have , and
so .
If is bounded by , then for , the approximation error is at most uniformly, giving uniform convergence. ∎
Let be a sequence of measurable functions. Then:
Proof:
(1) For any , we have
Since each is measurable, the countable union is measurable.
(2) Similarly, , so it is measurable.
(3) Note that . By (1) and (2), this is measurable.
(4) Similarly, is measurable. ∎
Problem: Show that the condition in Egorov's theorem is necessary by constructing a counterexample on an infinite measure space.
Solution:
Let with Lebesgue measure, and define
Then pointwise everywhere, since for any fixed , eventually .
However, for any set with , the convergence is not uniform on . In fact, for any , no matter how large the exceptional set is (as long as it has finite measure), there will be points in where for arbitrarily large .
This shows that Egorov's theorem fails when the measure space is infinite, demonstrating the necessity of the finite measure condition.
Problem: Consider the function on (the characteristic function of the rationals). Apply Lusin's theorem to approximate this function by a continuous function.
Solution:
The function is measurable (since is countable and hence measurable) but is discontinuous everywhere.
By Lusin's theorem, for any , there exists a closed set with such that is continuous on .
Since has measure zero, we can take (the irrationals in ). However, this set is not closed. Instead, we can remove a small open neighborhood around each rational point.
More precisely, enumerate . For each , remove an open interval where . The complement is closed, and on this closed set, is identically 0, hence continuous.
This demonstrates that even a function that is discontinuous everywhere can be made continuous on a set of nearly full measure.
Problem: Construct the first three approximations for the function on using the method in Theorem 2.7.
Solution:
Step 1:
We partition into intervals of length : . For , we have , so:
Step 2:
We partition into intervals of length : . This gives a finer approximation:
Step 3:
We partition into intervals of length , giving an even finer approximation with 24 steps in and the constant value 3 for .
As increases, becomes a better approximation to , with the error bounded by on .
Problem: Construct a measurable function on that is not continuous at any point.
Solution:
Consider the function , the characteristic function of the rationals in .
This function is measurable because is countable and hence measurable.
However, is discontinuous at every point. To see this, fix any . If , then , but in any neighborhood of , there are irrationals where takes the value 0. If , then , but in any neighborhood of , there are rationals where takes the value 1.
This example shows that measurability does not imply continuity, even though Lusin's theorem tells us that measurable functions are "almost continuous" in a measure-theoretic sense.
Problem: Give an example of a sequence of measurable functions that converges pointwise almost everywhere but not uniformly, even on sets of finite measure.
Solution:
On with Lebesgue measure, define
Then pointwise almost everywhere. Indeed, for any , we have for all . The only point where convergence fails is , which is a null set.
However, the convergence is not uniform on . For any , we have , so , which does not tend to 0.
This example illustrates why Egorov's theorem is remarkable: it tells us that even though uniform convergence may fail on the whole set, we can always find a large subset (all but a set of small measure) where uniform convergence holds.
If is a sequence of measurable functions and pointwise (or pointwise a.e.), then is measurable.
This follows immediately from Theorem 2.8, since when the limit exists.
A function is measurable if and only if is measurable for all Borel sets .
This is because the Borel σ-algebra is generated by intervals of the form , and measurability can be checked on a generating family.
Egorov's theorem (1911) and Lusin's theorem (1912) were fundamental results in the early development of measure theory and integration theory.
Egorov's theorem was proved by Dmitri Egorov, a Russian mathematician who was a student of Lebesgue. It bridges the gap between pointwise convergence (which is natural but weak) and uniform convergence (which is strong but often too restrictive). The theorem shows that on finite measure spaces, these two notions are "almost" equivalent.
Lusin's theorem was proved by Nikolai Luzin (also spelled Lusin), another Russian mathematician. It demonstrates a remarkable fact: measurable functions, which can be very irregular, are "almost continuous" in a precise measure-theoretic sense. This result connects measure theory with topology and is crucial for many applications.
Together, these theorems form part of "Littlewood's three principles," which summarize the approximation properties in measure theory: measurable sets are nearly open, measurable functions are nearly continuous, and pointwise convergence is nearly uniform.
There is a deep connection between measurability and topology:
These connections are essential for understanding how measure theory generalizes and extends classical analysis.
Measurable functions play a central role in probability theory:
The theory of measurable functions provides the rigorous foundation for modern probability theory and stochastic processes.
Problem: Show that any simple function can be written as a linear combination of characteristic functions of disjoint measurable sets.
Solution:
Let be a simple function. If the sets are not disjoint, we can refine them.
For example, if and and overlap, define:
Then , where the are disjoint.
This canonical form is useful for defining the integral of simple functions.
Problem: Let on . Apply Egorov's theorem to show that the convergence (pointwise on ) can be made uniform on a large subset.
Solution:
We have for and for all .
For any , Egorov's theorem guarantees a set with such that uniformly on .
In this case, we can take for small . On , we have , which tends to 0 uniformly.
This demonstrates how Egorov's theorem works: we exclude a small neighborhood of the problematic point (where convergence fails) to get uniform convergence on the remainder.
Problem: Consider the step function on . Show how Lusin's theorem applies.
Solution:
The function is measurable (as a simple function) but has jump discontinuities at the points and .
By Lusin's theorem, for any , there exists a closed set with such that is continuous on .
In this case, we can take to be minus small open neighborhoods around each discontinuity point. On the resulting closed set, is constant on each connected component, hence continuous.
This shows that even functions with many discontinuities can be made continuous on a set of nearly full measure.
Let be a measurable function on that is finite a.e. on a measurable set of finite measure.
Then for any , there exists a continuous function on such that .
This is a consequence of Lusin's theorem combined with Tietze's extension theorem.
Proof:
By Lusin's theorem, there exists a closed set with , , and is continuous on .
By Tietze's extension theorem, the continuous function can be extended to a continuous function on all of .
Then . ∎
For , the simple functions are dense in . That is, for any and , there exists a simple function such that .
Proof:
First approximate by a bounded function . For large , .
Then approximate by a simple function using the construction in Theorem 2.7. The approximation can be made arbitrarily close in norm. ∎
For , continuous functions with compact support are dense in .
This follows from the density of simple functions and Lemma 2.1, which allows approximation of simple functions by continuous functions.
Problem: Show that there exist measurable functions that are not Borel measurable.
Solution:
Let be the Cantor set and be a non-Borel measurable subset of (such sets exist by the Axiom of Choice).
Define . Since is measurable (as a subset of a null set), is measurable.
However, is not Borel, so is not Borel measurable.
This shows that the class of measurable functions is strictly larger than the class of Borel measurable functions.
In addition to pointwise and uniform convergence, there is another important mode of convergence:
Convergence in measure: A sequence converges in measure to if for every ,
Convergence in measure is weaker than pointwise convergence a.e. but stronger than convergence in Lp. It plays an important role in probability theory (where it corresponds to convergence in probability).
Egorov's theorem shows that on finite measure spaces, pointwise convergence a.e. implies convergence in measure, and the converse holds along a subsequence.
The theory of measurable functions is essential for Lebesgue integration:
Without the theory of measurable functions, we could not have a satisfactory theory of integration for the wide class of functions that Lebesgue integration handles.
Key takeaways:
Measurable functions form a much larger class than continuous functions and are closed under pointwise limits. Many important functions in analysis (like step functions, indicator functions, and limits of sequences) are measurable but not continuous. The theory of Lebesgue integration requires measurable functions.
Simple functions are a special class of measurable functions that take only finitely many values. They serve as building blocks: any nonnegative measurable function can be approximated by an increasing sequence of simple functions, which is crucial for defining the Lebesgue integral.
Egorov's theorem shows that on a set of finite measure, pointwise convergence almost everywhere can be 'upgraded' to uniform convergence on a large subset (all but a set of arbitrarily small measure). This bridges the gap between pointwise and uniform convergence in measure theory.
Lusin's theorem shows that measurable functions are 'almost continuous' in a precise sense: given any measurable function on a set of finite measure, we can find a subset of nearly full measure where the function is continuous. This is remarkable since measurable functions can be very irregular.
Yes, all continuous functions are measurable. This follows because the preimage of an open set under a continuous function is open, and open sets are measurable. However, not all measurable functions are continuous.
A property holds almost everywhere if it fails only on a set of measure zero. In practice, this means the property holds 'almost always' and exceptions are negligible from a measure-theoretic perspective. For example, two functions that differ only on a countable set are equal almost everywhere.
The fact that pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable ensures that the class of measurable functions is closed under limit operations. This is essential for integration theory, as we often need to take limits of sequences of functions.