Before starting this course, you should be familiar with:
Fundamental definitions and properties
Let be a simple function, where are disjoint measurable sets. The Lebesgue integral of is defined as:
This definition is independent of the representation of .
For a nonnegative measurable function , the Lebesgue integral is defined as:
The integral may be infinite. If , we say is integrable.
A measurable function is said to be absolutely integrable (or in ) if:
The space consists of all absolutely integrable functions (modulo functions that are zero almost everywhere).
For a general measurable function , define the positive and negative parts:
Then and . The Lebesgue integral is defined as:
provided at least one of the integrals on the right is finite. If both are finite, .
Let be integrable functions and . Then:
Proof:
The proof proceeds by first establishing linearity for simple functions, then extending to nonnegative functions using the definition, and finally to general functions using the positive/negative decomposition. ∎
Let be a sequence of nonnegative measurable functions. Then:
Proof:
Let . Then is an increasing sequence with .
By the monotone convergence theorem (which we prove next), .
Since , we have , so
∎
Let be an increasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions converging pointwise to . Then:
Proof:
Since , we have , so .
For the reverse inequality, let be a simple function with . For , define .
Then and .
Taking limits, . Since this holds for all and all simple , we get . ∎
Problem: Compute on .
Solution:
Since is a simple function,
This matches our intuitive notion that the integral should equal the length of the interval.
Problem: Compute where .
Solution:
The space is a vector space under pointwise addition and scalar multiplication.
Let and be measurable functions.
Proof:
(1) For nonnegative functions, this follows from the definition. For general functions, write and . Since , we have and , so
(2) If and , then for any simple function with , we have . This implies that is zero except on a null set.
(3) Since and , we have , so .
(4) We have , so by (1), , which gives the result. ∎
The space is complete with respect to the norm . That is, every Cauchy sequence in converges to a function in .
Proof:
Let be a Cauchy sequence in . Then there exists a subsequence such that
Define . Then is an increasing sequence of nonnegative functions, and
By the monotone convergence theorem, pointwise a.e. for some .
Since , the sequence converges pointwise a.e. to some function . By Fatou's lemma,
Since is Cauchy, the right-hand side tends to 0 as , so in . Since is Cauchy, the whole sequence converges to in . ∎
Let . Then for every , there exists such that for any measurable set with , we have
This property is called absolute continuity of the integral.
Proof:
Since , we have . For , choose a simple function such that and .
Let . Then for any measurable set ,
Choose . Then if , we have
∎
Problem: Compute using the definition of the Lebesgue integral.
Solution:
We approximate by simple functions. For each , define
Then and
As , this tends to .
By the monotone convergence theorem, , which agrees with the Riemann integral.
Problem: Consider the function . Compare its Riemann and Lebesgue integrals.
Solution:
Riemann integral: This function is discontinuous at every point, so it is not Riemann integrable. The upper and lower Riemann sums do not converge to the same value.
Lebesgue integral: Since is countable, it has measure zero. Therefore, almost everywhere, so
This example demonstrates that the Lebesgue integral can integrate functions that are not Riemann integrable, and it gives the "correct" answer (0) by ignoring the null set of discontinuities.
Problem: Compute .
Solution:
Define for .
For , for all .
For , we have as (since the denominator grows faster than the numerator).
However, the sequence is not monotone. Instead, we can use the dominated convergence theorem (to be covered later) or compute directly:
Using the substitution , we get
As , this tends to 0. Therefore, .
Note that pointwise, but the convergence is not uniform. The dominated convergence theorem (covered in the next course) provides a more elegant solution.
Problem: Construct a function on that is in but is unbounded.
Solution:
Define
This function is unbounded (it tends to infinity as ), but
Therefore, even though it is unbounded. This shows that functions need not be bounded; they only need to have finite integral of their absolute value.
Problem: Give an example of a function that is Lebesgue integrable (absolutely integrable) but not Riemann integrable.
Solution:
Consider the function on , where is the Cantor set.
The Cantor set has measure zero (as shown in Example 1.4), so almost everywhere. Therefore,
However, is not Riemann integrable because it is discontinuous at every point of , and is uncountable (though it has measure zero).
More generally, any function that is nonzero only on a set of measure zero is Lebesgue integrable with integral 0, but may not be Riemann integrable if it has too many discontinuities.
The norm satisfies:
Together with completeness (Theorem 3.5), this makes a Banach space.
If and is a sequence of measurable sets with (in the sense that pointwise), then
This follows from the absolute continuity property (Theorem 3.6).
The Lebesgue integral was developed by Henri Lebesgue in his 1902 thesis, "Intégrale, longueur, aire" (Integral, length, area).
Motivation: The Riemann integral, while adequate for continuous functions, had limitations:
Lebesgue's insight: Instead of partitioning the domain (as in Riemann integration), partition the range. This allows integration of a much larger class of functions and provides better convergence properties.
Impact: The Lebesgue integral revolutionized analysis, providing the foundation for:
When do Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree?
If a function is Riemann integrable on a bounded interval, then it is Lebesgue integrable and the integrals are equal. However, the converse is false: many Lebesgue integrable functions are not Riemann integrable.
Key differences:
When to use which: For most modern analysis, the Lebesgue integral is preferred. Riemann integrals are still useful for computational purposes and when working with smooth functions, but Lebesgue theory provides the proper foundation.
The Lebesgue integral and L1 space are fundamental in functional analysis:
These applications demonstrate why L1 and the Lebesgue integral are central to modern analysis.
Problem: Compute .
Solution:
Define . Then is an increasing sequence of nonnegative functions converging pointwise to .
By the monotone convergence theorem,
This demonstrates how the Lebesgue integral handles unbounded domains naturally, using convergence theorems.
Problem: Compute .
Solution:
The function is unbounded near 0, but we can compute the integral using the monotone convergence theorem.
Define . Then is increasing and converges to pointwise.
By the monotone convergence theorem,
This shows that functions can be Lebesgue integrable even if they are unbounded, as long as the integral of the absolute value is finite.
Problem: Use a change of variables to compute .
Solution:
Let , so and .
When , ; when , .
By the change of variables formula for Lebesgue integrals,
The change of variables formula for Lebesgue integrals is more general than for Riemann integrals, as it applies to measurable functions and measurable transformations.
Let be a strictly increasing absolutely continuous function with and .
If , then and:
This generalizes the classical change of variables formula to Lebesgue integrals.
Proof:
The proof uses the fact that absolutely continuous functions map null sets to null sets, and the chain rule for derivatives of absolutely continuous functions.
For simple functions, the result follows from the definition. For general functions, approximate by simple functions and use convergence theorems. ∎
For and , define . Then:
This follows from the translation invariance of Lebesgue measure and the change of variables formula.
In practice, computing Lebesgue integrals often uses:
These techniques, combined with the powerful convergence theorems, make Lebesgue integration both theoretically elegant and computationally practical.
The Lebesgue integral has been extended in several directions:
These extensions demonstrate the versatility and power of the Lebesgue integral as a foundation for modern analysis.
Key takeaways:
Lebesgue integration applies to a much larger class of functions and has better convergence properties. The dominated convergence theorem and monotone convergence theorem allow us to exchange limits and integrals under much weaker conditions than in Riemann integration.
For a general measurable function $f$, we write $f = f^+ - f^-$ where $f^+ = \max(f, 0)$ and $f^- = \max(-f, 0)$ are the positive and negative parts. The integral is defined as $\int f = \int f^+ - \int f^-$, provided at least one of these is finite. If both are finite, $f$ is absolutely integrable (in $L^1$).
$L^1$ is the space of absolutely integrable functions. For $p > 1$, $L^p$ consists of functions with $\int |f|^p < \infty$. All $L^p$ spaces are complete normed vector spaces (Banach spaces), with $L^2$ being a Hilbert space.
Fatou's lemma provides a lower bound for the integral of a limit inferior, which is crucial for proving convergence theorems. It's often used as a stepping stone to prove the monotone and dominated convergence theorems.
No, not in general. However, the monotone convergence theorem (for increasing sequences of nonnegative functions) and dominated convergence theorem (for sequences dominated by an $L^1$ function) provide conditions under which this exchange is valid.
Completeness means that every Cauchy sequence in $L^1$ converges to a function in $L^1$. This is the Riesz-Fischer theorem and is crucial for many applications in analysis, as it ensures that limits of integrable functions remain integrable.
For many practical purposes, we use the fundamental theorem of calculus when the function is sufficiently regular. For more general functions, we approximate by simple functions, use convergence theorems, or relate to Riemann integrals when applicable.