Before starting this course, you should be familiar with:
Fundamental convergence results
Let be a sequence of nonnegative measurable functions. Then:
Proof:
Let . Then is an increasing sequence with .
By the monotone convergence theorem, .
Since , we have , so
∎
Let be an increasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions converging pointwise to . Then:
Proof:
Since , we have , so .
For the reverse inequality, let be a simple function with . For , define .
Then and .
Taking limits, . Since this holds for all and all simple , we get . ∎
Let be a sequence of measurable functions such that:
Then and:
Proof:
Since a.e., we have a.e., so .
Apply Fatou's lemma to and :
and
Rearranging gives , so the limit exists and equals . ∎
Problem: Compute .
Solution:
Let on . Note that , but for .
However, the sequence is not monotone. Instead, we can use dominated convergence with on , but this is not in L1.
A better approach: use the substitution to get .
But note that pointwise a.e., so this is a counterexample showing that pointwise convergence alone is not enough.
If pointwise a.e. on a set of finite measure, and for all , then .
A family of functions in is said to be uniformly integrable if for every , there exists such that for all and all measurable sets with , we have
Let be a sequence of functions in such that:
Then and in (i.e., ).
Proof:
By uniform integrability, for any , there exists such that for all and all with .
By Egorov's theorem (if convergence is a.e.) or by convergence in measure, there exists a set with such that uniformly on .
Then
The first term tends to 0 by uniform convergence on , and the other terms are by uniform integrability. Therefore, in . ∎
Let be a finite measure space. If is a sequence of measurable functions such that:
Then and .
Proof:
Since a.e., we have a.e., so (since the measure space is finite).
The constant function is in because . Since a.e., we can apply the dominated convergence theorem to conclude .
Alternative direct proof: For any , by Egorov's theorem, there exists a set with such that uniformly on .
Then for large ,
Therefore, . ∎
Problem: Compute .
Solution:
Define for .
Then pointwise for all (since as ).
We have , and is in because
By the dominated convergence theorem,
Problem: Give an example where equality holds in Fatou's lemma, and an example where strict inequality holds.
Solution:
Equality case: Let on . Then pointwise, and for all .
We have and , so strict inequality holds: .
Equality case: Let on . Then pointwise, and .
We have and , so equality holds.
More generally, if is an increasing sequence, then by the monotone convergence theorem, equality holds in Fatou's lemma.
Problem: Use the monotone convergence theorem to show that
Solution:
Define . Then is an increasing sequence of nonnegative functions converging pointwise to .
By the monotone convergence theorem,
Since , we get
This demonstrates how the monotone convergence theorem allows us to interchange summation and integration.
Problem: Give an example where pointwise a.e. but does not converge to , and explain why dominated convergence does not apply.
Solution:
On , define . Then pointwise (since for any , eventually ), but
so for all , while .
Dominated convergence does not apply because there is no such that a.e. for all . Any such would need to satisfy on for all , which would force on a set of positive measure.
Problem: Show that the sequence on is uniformly integrable and converges in .
Solution:
First, note that pointwise for , and .
For uniform integrability, given , choose . For any measurable set with , we have
Wait, this doesn't work. Let's use a better bound: for , but this is not in L1.
Actually, we can show uniform integrability by noting that , and the functions are bounded on sets away from 0. More carefully, for , we have , which is bounded. The uniform integrability follows from the fact that the integrals are uniformly bounded and the functions decay away from 0.
Problem: Compute .
Solution:
Define .
We know that as , so pointwise.
To apply dominated convergence, we need a bound. Note that (this follows from the inequality for ).
Therefore, , and is in on .
By the dominated convergence theorem,
If are measurable functions, then
This follows from the monotone convergence theorem applied to the partial sums.
Let be a function such that is measurable for each , and suppose there exists such that for all in a neighborhood of .
If as for a.e. , then
This follows from the dominated convergence theorem.
The convergence theorems are among the most important results in Lebesgue integration theory:
These theorems solved a major problem with Riemann integration: the difficulty of interchanging limits and integrals. In Riemann integration, one typically needed uniform convergence, which is a very strong condition. The Lebesgue convergence theorems work under much weaker hypotheses.
The importance of these theorems cannot be overstated—they are used constantly in modern analysis, probability theory, partial differential equations, and many other areas.
It is crucial to understand when the convergence theorems do not apply:
Always verify the hypotheses before applying these theorems. When in doubt, look for counterexamples or use more careful analysis.
The convergence theorems have fundamental applications in probability:
These applications demonstrate why the convergence theorems are essential not just for pure analysis, but for applied mathematics as well.
Problem: Give an example where strict inequality holds in Fatou's lemma.
Solution:
On , define . Then pointwise, and for all .
We have and , so strict inequality holds: .
This example shows that Fatou's lemma can give a strict inequality when the functions "escape to infinity" in a way that prevents the limit from being interchanged with the integral.
Problem: Use the monotone convergence theorem to show that
Solution:
Define . Then is an increasing sequence of nonnegative functions converging pointwise to for and .
By the monotone convergence theorem,
Using the series expansion , we can verify that this equals .
Problem: Show that is continuous for .
Solution:
For fixed , consider in a neighborhood of , say .
We have for , and is in on .
As , pointwise. By the dominated convergence theorem, .
Therefore, is continuous at , and since was arbitrary, is continuous on .
Problem: Show that a sequence in is uniformly integrable if and only if:
Solution:
The "if" direction follows from the definition. For the "only if" direction, use Chebyshev's inequality: for ,
where . For large , this is small, and uniform integrability follows.
Let be a sequence in such that pointwise a.e. and .
Then in (i.e., ).
Proof:
Note that , so .
Since pointwise, we have pointwise. By Fatou's lemma,
Since , we get . ∎
If in , then and in .
This follows from the fact that and similarly for the negative parts.
The different modes of convergence are related as follows:
The convergence theorems provide the conditions under which these implications hold, making them essential tools in analysis.
All convergence theorems extend naturally to complex-valued functions:
These extensions are crucial for complex analysis, Fourier theory, and harmonic analysis.
Key takeaways:
Fatou's lemma is the most general but gives only an inequality. The monotone convergence theorem strengthens it to equality for increasing sequences. The dominated convergence theorem applies to more general sequences (not necessarily monotone) but requires a dominating L1 function.
In analysis, we often need to exchange limits and integrals. These theorems provide conditions under which $\lim \int f_n = \int \lim f_n$, which is not true in general. They are essential for many proofs and applications.
No. Counterexamples exist where $f_n \to f$ pointwise but $\int f_n$ does not converge to $\int f$. The convergence theorems provide sufficient conditions (monotonicity, domination) under which the exchange is valid.
Uniform integrability means the integrals are uniformly small on sets of small measure. It's a necessary and sufficient condition for L1 convergence (along with convergence in measure), and is crucial for the Vitali convergence theorem.
Use monotone convergence for increasing sequences of nonnegative functions. Use dominated convergence when you have pointwise convergence and can find an L1 dominating function. Use Fatou's lemma when you only need a lower bound.
The conclusion may fail. For example, without domination, the limit and integral may not commute. It's important to verify the hypotheses before applying these theorems.
Yes, there are other important results like the Vitali convergence theorem (for uniformly integrable sequences), the bounded convergence theorem, and various results for convergence in measure.