Question
This problem (7+8 points) aims to discuss the probability that ducks swimming independently in a circular pond all fall within the same semicircle. Let their positions (treated as point masses) be . Fix a point on the large circle. For each duck's position , draw a ray from the center of the pond through , intersecting the circumference at . Let denote the central angle traversed counter-clockwise from to . We may assume . Define , called the ``absolute coordinate'' of each duck. Fix one duck , called the ``lead duck'', and set . For every other duck , let be the central angle traversed counter-clockwise from to . Define the ``relative coordinate'' .
Derive the transformation formula from absolute coordinates to relative coordinates, and find the probability that all ducks fall within the same semicircle.
Step-by-step solution
The absolute coordinates and the central angles satisfy , where . The relative coordinate is determined by the angle traversed counter-clockwise from to , namely . When , the proportion corresponding to the counter-clockwise arc is ; when , the counter-clockwise path crosses the angle (i.e., ), and the corresponding proportion is . Therefore the transformation formula from absolute to relative coordinates is: This formula can also be written uniformly as . Regarding the probability that all ducks fall within the same semicircle, the problem is equivalent to asking whether, among points distributed uniformly at random on a circle of circumference , there exists an arc gap of length greater than . Let the points partition the circle into arcs of lengths , satisfying . The event "all points lie in the same semicircle" is equivalent to "there exists some such that ". Since the total length is , it is impossible for two arcs to simultaneously have length greater than , so the events for distinct are mutually exclusive. Consider the arc length starting at the -th point (denoted ) in the counter-clockwise direction. The event means that the arc of length starting counter-clockwise from contains no other points, or equivalently, all other points lie in the semicircle of length in the clockwise direction from . For a fixed , the probability that the remaining independently distributed points all fall in the designated semicircle is . Since there are points and corresponding mutually exclusive events, by the addition rule for mutually exclusive events, the probability that all points lie in the same semicircle is .
Final answer
The transformation formula is ; the probability is .
Marking scheme
The following is the detailed marking scheme for this problem (maximum 7 points).
I. Checkpoints (max 7 pts)
1. Coordinate Transformation Formula (2 pts)
- [Mutually exclusive] As long as the correct transformation logic is presented, the corresponding score is awarded:
- Writes out the complete formula including the wrap-around handling (e.g., piecewise function form, or the case, or the modular form ): 2 pts
- Writes only without addressing the case requiring addition of 1 or modular reduction: 1 pt
2. Probability Calculation (5 pts)
Choose one of the following paths for grading | If multiple paths apply, take the highest-scoring path; do not combine scores across paths
- Path A: Arc-length gap / mutually exclusive events method (standard solution approach)
- Event reformulation [cumulative]:
- States that "all points in the same semicircle" is equivalent to "there exists an arc gap between adjacent points greater than " or "there exists a point such that all other points lie within the arc of length in the clockwise direction from it": 1 pt
- States that the above events for different are mutually exclusive (i.e., two gaps greater than cannot coexist since the total circumference is 1): 1 pt
- Base probability calculation [cumulative]:
- Computes that for a fixed point (or a specific gap), the probability of satisfying the condition is : 2 pts
- Conclusion [cumulative]:
- Uses mutual exclusivity to sum the probabilities (multiply by ), obtaining the final result : 1 pt
*(Note: If only the result is stated without justification, this point is not awarded; the logic of the factor of must be demonstrated)*
- Path B: Geometric probability / integration method
- Integral formulation [cumulative]:
- Correctly sets up the integral expression (typically involving an -fold symmetric region integral, or an integral over the distribution of the maximum gap): 2 pts
- The integration limits or region decomposition implicitly incorporates the "mutual exclusivity" or "symmetry" argument (i.e., justifies the factor of ): 1 pt
- Computation [cumulative]:
- Correctly evaluates the definite integral: 1 pt
- Conclusion [cumulative]:
- Obtains the correct result : 1 pt
II. Zero-Credit Items
- Merely copies the definitions of or from the problem statement without deriving any formula.
- In the probability part, merely guesses the result as , , or some other constant without any probabilistic model to support it.
- Writes the coordinate transformation as a multiplicative or divisive relation (e.g., ) or as a distance formula (e.g., , failing to reflect directionality).
III. Deductions
*Apply at most one (the most severe) deduction from this section. The total score after deduction shall not fall below 0.*
- Missing factor of : In the probability calculation, obtains but neglects that there are mutually exclusive cases (i.e., assumes the ducks must fall in the semicircle starting from a specific point rather than any point): deduct 2 pts (or cap this section at 3/5).
- Degrees-of-freedom error: Result is written as (denominator has an extra factor of 2), typically caused by failing to fix the reference frame or over-counting independent variables: deduct 1 pt.
- Logical leap: Directly asserts , leading to an incorrect result (e.g., ): 0 pts for this section.
- Sign error: Transformation formula has the direction reversed (e.g., ) but the logic is otherwise self-consistent: deduct 1 pt.
Total (max 7)