MathIsimple

Probability Theory – Problem 26: Prove that

Question

Suppose gg is a function of period 1 that is continuous on [0,1][0,1]. Let XX be a random variable uniformly distributed on [0,1][0,1], and let α\alpha be an irrational number. Define Zn=g(X+(n1)α)Z_{n}=g(X+(n-1)\alpha). Prove that limn1ni=1nZi=01g(u)dua.s.\operatorname*{lim}_{n\to\infty}{\frac{1}{n}}\sum_{i=1}^{n}Z_{i}=\int_{0}^{1}g(u)\mathrm{d}u\qquad a.s.

Step-by-step solution

Step 1. Reformulate the problem in terms of a deterministic initial value xx

Let XX be uniformly distributed on [0,1][0,1], let α\alpha be irrational, and define Zn=g(X+(n1)α),n1.Z_n = g\bigl(X + (n-1)\alpha\bigr),\quad n\ge1. The function gg is continuous on [0,1][0,1] and has period 11, i.e., for every uRu\in\mathbb{R}, g(u+1)=g(u).g(u+1)=g(u).

For a real number yy, denote its fractional part by {y}:=yy[0,1),\{y\} := y-\lfloor y\rfloor\in[0,1), so that by periodicity g(y)=g({y})g(y)=g(\{y\}).

Fix a deterministic x[0,1]x\in[0,1] and consider the sequence Yn(x)=g(x+(n1)α),n1.Y_n(x)=g\bigl(x+(n-1)\alpha\bigr),\quad n\ge1. The random setting is recovered by replacing xx with the random variable XX. If we can show that for every deterministic x[0,1]x\in[0,1], limn1ni=1nYi(x)=01g(u)du,\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}Y_i(x) = \int_0^1 g(u)\,du, then in the random setting, for almost every sample point ω\omega, X(ω)X(\omega) takes some value x[0,1]x\in[0,1], and hence limn1ni=1nZi(ω)=01g(u)du.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}Z_i(\omega) = \int_0^1 g(u)\,du.

It therefore suffices to prove: for every deterministic x[0,1]x\in[0,1], limn1ni=1ng(x+(i1)α)=01g(u)du.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} g\bigl(x+(i-1)\alpha\bigr) = \int_0^1 g(u)\,du. Set yi:={x+(i1)α}[0,1),i1.y_i := \{x+(i-1)\alpha\}\in[0,1),\quad i\ge1. Since gg has period 11, the above is equivalent to limn1ni=1ng(yi)=01g(u)du.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} g(y_i) = \int_0^1 g(u)\,du.

Step 2. Use the Weyl equidistribution criterion to show that {x+(n1)α}\{x+(n-1)\alpha\} is equidistributed on [0,1][0,1]

Equidistribution modulo 11: A sequence {yi}i1[0,1)\{y_i\}_{i\ge1}\subset[0,1) is said to be equidistributed on [0,1][0,1] if for every interval [a,b][0,1][a,b]\subset[0,1], limn1ni=1n1[a,b](yi)=ba.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} 1_{[a,b]}(y_i) = b-a.

Weyl's criterion: {yi}\{y_i\} is equidistributed on [0,1][0,1] if and only if for every nonzero integer kZ{0}k\in\mathbb{Z}\setminus\{0\}, limn1ni=1ne2πikyi=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} e^{2\pi i k y_i} = 0.

For the sequence yi={x+(i1)α}y_i=\{x+(i-1)\alpha\} in this problem, take any k0k\ne 0 and consider Sn(k)=1ni=1ne2πikyi=1ni=1ne2πik(x+(i1)α).S_n(k) =\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} e^{2\pi i k y_i} =\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} e^{2\pi i k (x+(i-1)\alpha)}. Factoring out the common term gives Sn(k)=e2πikxnj=0n1e2πikαj.S_n(k) = \frac{e^{2\pi i k x}}{n}\sum_{j=0}^{n-1} e^{2\pi i k \alpha j}. Let r:=e2πikα.r := e^{2\pi i k\alpha}. Since α\alpha is irrational, kαk\alpha is not an integer, so r1r\ne 1. Thus j=0n1rj=1rn1r,\sum_{j=0}^{n-1} r^j = \frac{1-r^n}{1-r}, and hence Sn(k)=e2πikx1rnn(1r).S_n(k)= e^{2\pi i k x}\,\frac{1-r^n}{n(1-r)}. Therefore Sn(k)1rnn1r2n1rn0.|S_n(k)| \le \frac{|1-r^n|}{n|1-r|} \le \frac{2}{n|1-r|}\xrightarrow[n\to\infty]{}0.

This holds for all k0k\ne0. By Weyl's criterion, for every xRx\in\mathbb{R}, the sequence yi={x+(i1)α}y_i=\{x+(i-1)\alpha\} is equidistributed on [0,1][0,1].

Step 3. Limiting average for step functions

First verify the conclusion for simple step functions. Let s(u)=j=1mcj1(aj,bj](u),s(u) = \sum_{j=1}^{m} c_j\,1_{(a_j,b_j]}(u), where 0aj<bj10\le a_j<b_j\le1 and cjRc_j\in\mathbb{R}. Then 01s(u)du=j=1mcj(bjaj).\int_0^1 s(u)\,du = \sum_{j=1}^{m} c_j (b_j-a_j).

By the equidistribution of yiy_i, for each interval (aj,bj](a_j,b_j], limn1ni=1n1(aj,bj](yi)=bjaj.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} 1_{(a_j,b_j]}(y_i) = b_j-a_j. Hence limn1ni=1ns(yi)=limn1ni=1nj=1mcj1(aj,bj](yi)=j=1mcj(limn1ni=1n1(aj,bj](yi))=j=1mcj(bjaj)=01s(u)du.\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} s(y_i) &= \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{m} c_j\,1_{(a_j,b_j]}(y_i) \\ &= \sum_{j=1}^{m} c_j \left( \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} 1_{(a_j,b_j]}(y_i) \right) \\ &= \sum_{j=1}^{m} c_j (b_j-a_j) = \int_0^1 s(u)\,du. \end{aligned}

Thus for every step function ss, limn1ni=1ns(yi)=01s(u)du.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} s(y_i) = \int_0^1 s(u)\,du.

Step 4. Uniform approximation of the continuous function gg by step functions

Since gg is continuous on the compact interval [0,1][0,1], it is uniformly continuous and bounded. For any ε>0\varepsilon>0, there exists a step function sεs_\varepsilon such that supu[0,1]g(u)sε(u)ε.\sup_{u\in[0,1]} |g(u)-s_\varepsilon(u)| \le \varepsilon.

For a fixed xx and the corresponding sequence yiy_i, set An:=1ni=1ng(yi),Bn:=1ni=1nsε(yi).A_n := \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} g(y_i),\quad B_n := \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} s_\varepsilon(y_i). Then AnBn1ni=1ng(yi)sε(yi)supu[0,1]g(u)sε(u)ε.|A_n-B_n| \le \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} |g(y_i)-s_\varepsilon(y_i)| \le \sup_{u\in[0,1]} |g(u)-s_\varepsilon(u)| \le \varepsilon.

By the result of the previous step for step functions, limnBn=01sε(u)du.\lim_{n\to\infty} B_n = \int_0^1 s_\varepsilon(u)\,du. Therefore An01g(u)duAnBn+Bn01sε(u)du+01sε(u)du01g(u)duε+Bn01sε(u)du+01sε(u)g(u)duε+Bn01sε(u)du+ε.\begin{aligned} \left|A_n - \int_0^1 g(u)\,du\right| &\le |A_n-B_n| + \left|B_n-\int_0^1 s_\varepsilon(u)\,du\right| + \left|\int_0^1 s_\varepsilon(u)\,du - \int_0^1 g(u)\,du\right| \\ &\le \varepsilon + \left|B_n-\int_0^1 s_\varepsilon(u)\,du\right| + \int_0^1 |s_\varepsilon(u)-g(u)|\,du \\ &\le \varepsilon + \left|B_n-\int_0^1 s_\varepsilon(u)\,du\right| + \varepsilon. \end{aligned} Letting nn\to\infty, the middle term tends to 00, yielding lim supnAn01g(u)du2ε.\limsup_{n\to\infty}\left|A_n - \int_0^1 g(u)\,du\right| \le 2\varepsilon. Since ε>0\varepsilon>0 is arbitrary, limnAn=limn1ni=1ng(yi)=01g(u)du.\lim_{n\to\infty}A_n =\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} g(y_i) =\int_0^1 g(u)\,du.

This holds for every x[0,1]x\in[0,1].

Step 5. Return to the random variable XX and ZnZ_n to obtain almost sure convergence

For each sample point ω\omega, set x=X(ω)[0,1]x=X(\omega)\in[0,1]. Then Zi(ω)=g(X(ω)+(i1)α)=g(x+(i1)α).Z_i(\omega) = g\bigl(X(\omega)+(i-1)\alpha\bigr) = g\bigl(x+(i-1)\alpha\bigr). By the conclusion of Step 4, for this xx, limn1ni=1nZi(ω)=01g(u)du.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} Z_i(\omega) = \int_0^1 g(u)\,du. Since this conclusion holds for all x[0,1]x\in[0,1], it holds for almost every ω\omega as well, i.e., limn1ni=1nZi=01g(u)dua.s.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} Z_i = \int_0^1 g(u)\,du \quad \text{a.s.}

Final answer

QED.

Marking scheme

The following rubric is based on the official solution and common advanced approaches.


1. Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)

Score only one of the following paths (whichever yields the higher score); points from different paths do not stack.

Path A: Analysis and Approximation (Weyl Equidistribution) -- Official Solution Approach

  • Deterministic reduction (1 pt):
  • Reduce the probabilistic problem to a deterministic analysis: fix X=xX=x and study the Cesaro mean of the deterministic sequence yi=x+(i1)α(mod1)y_i = x+(i-1)\alpha \pmod 1.
  • Convergence for a basic function class (2 pts):
  • Prove that 1n\frac{1}{n}\sum \to \int holds for a simple function class (e.g., complex exponentials e2πikue^{2\pi i k u} or interval indicator functions 1[a,b]\mathbf{1}_{[a,b]}).
  • *Key requirement:* Must use the condition that α\alpha is irrational (e.g., showing that kαk\alpha is not an integer so the denominator of the geometric series is nonzero, or directly invoking Weyl's criterion / the equidistribution theorem for irrational rotations).
  • Approximation to extend to general functions (2 pts):
  • Use the continuity (or uniform continuity) of gg to approximate by step functions or, via the Stone--Weierstrass theorem, by trigonometric polynomials, thereby extending the conclusion from the basic class to arbitrary continuous gg.
  • Probabilistic conclusion (2 pts):
  • State that the above limit holds for every (or almost every) x[0,1]x \in [0,1], and combine with the fact that XX is uniformly distributed to conclude that the original statement holds with probability 1 (a.s.).

Path B: Ergodic Theory

  • Dynamical system formulation (1 pt):
  • Define the measure-preserving transformation T:[0,1][0,1]T: [0,1] \to [0,1] by Tx=(x+α)(mod1)Tx = (x+\alpha) \pmod 1, and note that the distribution of XX (Lebesgue measure) is an invariant measure for this transformation.
  • Ergodicity verification [core difficulty] (3 pts):
  • Explicitly state: because α\alpha is irrational, the rotation is ergodic with respect to Lebesgue measure.
  • *If one merely states Birkhoff's theorem without mentioning the key ergodicity condition stemming from irrationality, this item scores 0.*
  • Theorem application (1 pt):
  • Apply Birkhoff's Ergodic Theorem to conclude that the time average equals the space average: limn1ng(Tix)=01g(u)du\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n}\sum g(T^i x) = \int_0^1 g(u)\,du for a.e. xx.
  • Probabilistic conclusion (2 pts):
  • Combine with XU[0,1]X \sim U[0,1] to conclude that the limit for ZnZ_n holds almost surely (a.s.).

Total (max 7)


2. Zero-credit items

  • Incorrect premise: Claiming that ZnZ_n is an i.i.d. sequence (the terms are deterministically coupled).
  • Misapplication of the law of large numbers: Directly applying the SLLN to ZnZ_n without establishing independence or uncorrelatedness.
  • Conceptual confusion: Incorrectly treating the sum as a Riemann sum for gg on [0,1][0,1] (i.e., mistaking the sample points for the regular grid i/ni/n rather than the irrational rotation x+iαx+i\alpha).
  • Vacuous argument: Merely restating the given hypotheses or writing down the expression for ZnZ_n with no substantive derivation.

3. Deductions

  • Logical gap (up to -2): In Path A, when computing the geometric sum e2πik(x+jα)\sum e^{2\pi i k (x+j\alpha)}, failing to explicitly note that irrationality of α\alpha ensures the denominator 1e2πikα01-e^{2\pi i k \alpha} \ne 0.
  • Incomplete conclusion (up to -1): Completing the pointwise convergence proof but omitting the final probabilistic statement (i.e., not connecting to "a.s." or "with probability 1").
  • Notational confusion (no deduction): If the reasoning is correct, merely confusing the random variable XX (uppercase) with the sample value xx (lowercase) incurs no penalty provided it does not cause a logical contradiction.
Ask AI ✨