Question
Suppose is a function of period 1 that is continuous on . Let be a random variable uniformly distributed on , and let be an irrational number. Define . Prove that
Step-by-step solution
Step 1. Reformulate the problem in terms of a deterministic initial value
Let be uniformly distributed on , let be irrational, and define The function is continuous on and has period , i.e., for every ,
For a real number , denote its fractional part by so that by periodicity .
Fix a deterministic and consider the sequence The random setting is recovered by replacing with the random variable . If we can show that for every deterministic , then in the random setting, for almost every sample point , takes some value , and hence
It therefore suffices to prove: for every deterministic , Set Since has period , the above is equivalent to
Step 2. Use the Weyl equidistribution criterion to show that is equidistributed on
Equidistribution modulo : A sequence is said to be equidistributed on if for every interval ,
Weyl's criterion: is equidistributed on if and only if for every nonzero integer ,
For the sequence in this problem, take any and consider Factoring out the common term gives Let Since is irrational, is not an integer, so . Thus and hence Therefore
This holds for all . By Weyl's criterion, for every , the sequence is equidistributed on .
Step 3. Limiting average for step functions
First verify the conclusion for simple step functions. Let where and . Then
By the equidistribution of , for each interval , Hence
Thus for every step function ,
Step 4. Uniform approximation of the continuous function by step functions
Since is continuous on the compact interval , it is uniformly continuous and bounded. For any , there exists a step function such that
For a fixed and the corresponding sequence , set Then
By the result of the previous step for step functions, Therefore Letting , the middle term tends to , yielding Since is arbitrary,
This holds for every .
Step 5. Return to the random variable and to obtain almost sure convergence
For each sample point , set . Then By the conclusion of Step 4, for this , Since this conclusion holds for all , it holds for almost every as well, i.e.,
Final answer
QED.
Marking scheme
The following rubric is based on the official solution and common advanced approaches.
1. Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)
Score only one of the following paths (whichever yields the higher score); points from different paths do not stack.
Path A: Analysis and Approximation (Weyl Equidistribution) -- Official Solution Approach
- Deterministic reduction (1 pt):
- Reduce the probabilistic problem to a deterministic analysis: fix and study the Cesaro mean of the deterministic sequence .
- Convergence for a basic function class (2 pts):
- Prove that holds for a simple function class (e.g., complex exponentials or interval indicator functions ).
- *Key requirement:* Must use the condition that is irrational (e.g., showing that is not an integer so the denominator of the geometric series is nonzero, or directly invoking Weyl's criterion / the equidistribution theorem for irrational rotations).
- Approximation to extend to general functions (2 pts):
- Use the continuity (or uniform continuity) of to approximate by step functions or, via the Stone--Weierstrass theorem, by trigonometric polynomials, thereby extending the conclusion from the basic class to arbitrary continuous .
- Probabilistic conclusion (2 pts):
- State that the above limit holds for every (or almost every) , and combine with the fact that is uniformly distributed to conclude that the original statement holds with probability 1 (a.s.).
Path B: Ergodic Theory
- Dynamical system formulation (1 pt):
- Define the measure-preserving transformation by , and note that the distribution of (Lebesgue measure) is an invariant measure for this transformation.
- Ergodicity verification [core difficulty] (3 pts):
- Explicitly state: because is irrational, the rotation is ergodic with respect to Lebesgue measure.
- *If one merely states Birkhoff's theorem without mentioning the key ergodicity condition stemming from irrationality, this item scores 0.*
- Theorem application (1 pt):
- Apply Birkhoff's Ergodic Theorem to conclude that the time average equals the space average: for a.e. .
- Probabilistic conclusion (2 pts):
- Combine with to conclude that the limit for holds almost surely (a.s.).
Total (max 7)
2. Zero-credit items
- Incorrect premise: Claiming that is an i.i.d. sequence (the terms are deterministically coupled).
- Misapplication of the law of large numbers: Directly applying the SLLN to without establishing independence or uncorrelatedness.
- Conceptual confusion: Incorrectly treating the sum as a Riemann sum for on (i.e., mistaking the sample points for the regular grid rather than the irrational rotation ).
- Vacuous argument: Merely restating the given hypotheses or writing down the expression for with no substantive derivation.
3. Deductions
- Logical gap (up to -2): In Path A, when computing the geometric sum , failing to explicitly note that irrationality of ensures the denominator .
- Incomplete conclusion (up to -1): Completing the pointwise convergence proof but omitting the final probabilistic statement (i.e., not connecting to "a.s." or "with probability 1").
- Notational confusion (no deduction): If the reasoning is correct, merely confusing the random variable (uppercase) with the sample value (lowercase) incurs no penalty provided it does not cause a logical contradiction.