Question
The random variables and have the joint density function . (1) Find the distribution of ; (2) Find the distribution of .
Step-by-step solution
We first determine the support of the joint density function . For this to be positive, we must have . To ensure the density integrates to 1 over the entire plane, we determine the range of . The support is . Verification: Evaluating the inner integral: Substituting into the outer integral: The integral equals 1, confirming that the support of is . (1) Find the distribution of . Using the CDF method. Since and , we have . For , . For , the CDF is: Expressing the region of integration as : Evaluating the inner integral with respect to : Substituting into the outer integral: This is the CDF of an exponential distribution with parameter 1. Differentiating yields the PDF of :
(2) Find the distribution of . Again using the CDF method. Since and , we have . For , . For , the CDF is: The region of integration can be expressed as . For , we need , i.e., . So the limits of integration are . Evaluating the inner integral with respect to : Substituting into the outer integral: Differentiating yields the PDF of : This is the density function of a Gamma distribution with parameters .
Final answer
(1) follows an exponential distribution with parameter 1, with PDF for . (2) follows a Gamma distribution with parameters (i.e., ), with PDF for .
Marking scheme
This is an undergraduate mathematics marking scheme (total score: 7 points) provided for your reference. The scheme is based on the official solution logic while also accepting equivalent approaches via the change-of-variables method or structural/property-based methods.
1. Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)
Part 1: Distribution of (Max 3 pts)
Score exactly one chain | Choose one of the following paths for grading
*Chain A: CDF Method / Change-of-Variables Method*
- Integral or transformation setup [1 pt]: Correctly write the double integral defining the CDF (with correct limits of integration, e.g., ) or correctly write the joint density and Jacobian determinant via change of variables.
- Derivation [1 pt]: Correctly evaluate the inner integral or marginalization integral to obtain the intermediate result (e.g., ).
- Final result [1 pt]: Differentiate the CDF or simplify to obtain the correct PDF (must specify ).
*Chain B: Property-Based Method (Structural Recognition)*
- Distribution identification [1 pt]: Correctly identify the marginal distribution and the conditional distribution .
- Scaling argument [1 pt]: Use the scaling property of the exponential distribution () to argue that follows .
- Final result [1 pt]: Explicitly write the PDF (must specify ).
Part 2: Distribution of (Max 4 pts)
Score exactly one chain | Choose one of the following paths for grading
*Chain A: CDF Method / Change-of-Variables Method*
- Integral or transformation setup [1 pt]: Correctly set up the integral expression for or set up the change-of-variables framework for .
- Critical region determination [1 pt]: (Key difficulty) Correctly derive that the upper limit for the integration variable is (i.e., ), because .
- *Note: If the integration limit is incorrectly written as to , this checkpoint scores 0.*
- Derivation [1 pt]: Correctly carry out the integration to obtain or the corresponding marginalization of the joint density.
- Final result [1 pt]: Differentiate to obtain the correct PDF (must specify ).
*Chain B: Convolution Method (Using Independence)*
- Independence statement [1 pt]: Based on the result of Part 1, explicitly state that and are independent (since the distribution of does not depend on ).
- Model identification [1 pt]: Reformulate the problem as the sum of two independent variables, and cite the convolution formula or Gamma distribution properties.
- Computation [1 pt]: Correctly carry out the convolution integral or write the specific parameter form of the Gamma(2,1) distribution.
- Final result [1 pt]: Explicitly write the PDF (must specify ).
Total (max 7)
2. Zero-credit items
- Merely copying the joint density function formula from the problem statement without setting up any specific integral.
- Only verifying without performing any subsequent distribution computation (unless done as a necessary step to determine the limits of integration).
- Only writing the general CDF definition formula without substituting the specific functions from this problem.
3. Deductions
- Missing domain specification (Max -1): The final result does not indicate the variable range (e.g., or ), or does not introduce an indicator function. At most 1 point deducted across the entire paper.
- Logical gap (Max -2): In Part 2, failing to discuss the critical constraint yet "arriving at" the correct final result (e.g., by forcing the integral result to match the answer).
- Algebraic error (Max -1): Sign errors in differentiation or simple arithmetic steps that do not affect the overall logic.