MathIsimple

Probability Theory – Problem 75: Prove: (1)

Question

Let X1,,XnX_{1},\cdots, X_{n} be i.i.d. random variables satisfying P(Xi  >  x)  =  ex\mathbb{P}(X_{i}\;>\;x)\;=\;e^{-x}, and denote Mn  =  max1mnXmM_{n}\;=\;\operatorname*{max}_{1\leq m\leq n}X_{m}. Prove: (1) lim supnXnlogn=1a.s.\operatorname*{lim\,sup}_{n\to\infty}\frac{X_{n}}{\log n}=1\quad\mathrm{a.s.} (2) limnMnlogn=1a.s.\operatorname*{lim}_{n\to\infty}\frac{M_{n}}{\log n}=1\quad\mathrm{a.s.}

Step-by-step solution

(1) Proof that lim supnXnlogn=1a.s.\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{X_n}{\log n} = 1 \quad \text{a.s.} Step 1. Prove lim supnXnlogn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{X_n}{\log n} \le 1 a.s. By the definition of the limit superior, it suffices to show that for any given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, the event {Xnlogn>1+ϵ}\left\{ \frac{X_n}{\log n} > 1 + \epsilon \right\} can occur only finitely many times (almost surely). By the first Borel--Cantelli lemma, it suffices to show that the series n=1P(Xnlogn>1+ϵ)\sum_{n=1}^\infty P\left(\frac{X_n}{\log n} > 1 + \epsilon\right) converges. Using the given tail probability P(Xi>x)=exP(X_i > x) = e^{-x}: P(Xnlogn>1+ϵ)=P(Xn>(1+ϵ)logn)P\left(\frac{X_n}{\log n} > 1 + \epsilon\right) = P(X_n > (1+\epsilon)\log n) Setting x=(1+ϵ)lognx = (1+\epsilon)\log n: P(Xn>(1+ϵ)logn)=e(1+ϵ)logn=(elogn)(1+ϵ)=n(1+ϵ)P(X_n > (1+\epsilon)\log n) = e^{-(1+\epsilon)\log n} = (e^{\log n})^{-(1+\epsilon)} = n^{-(1+\epsilon)} Since ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, we have 1+ϵ>11+\epsilon > 1. This is a pp-series with p=1+ϵ>1p = 1+\epsilon > 1, so n=1n(1+ϵ)\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-(1+\epsilon)} converges. By the first Borel--Cantelli lemma, P(Xnlogn>1+ϵ i.o.)=0P\left( \frac{X_n}{\log n} > 1 + \epsilon \text{ i.o.}\right) = 0. Since ϵ\epsilon is arbitrary, lim supnXnlogn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{X_n}{\log n} \le 1 a.s.

Step 2. Prove lim supnXnlogn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{X_n}{\log n} \ge 1 a.s. For any 0<ϵ<10 < \epsilon < 1, the events An={Xnlogn>1ϵ}A_n = \left\{ \frac{X_n}{\log n} > 1 - \epsilon \right\} are mutually independent since the XnX_n are i.i.d. P(An)=n(1ϵ)P(A_n) = n^{-(1-\epsilon)}. Since 1ϵ<11-\epsilon < 1, the series n=1n(1ϵ)\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-(1-\epsilon)} diverges. By the second Borel--Cantelli lemma, P(An i.o.)=1P(A_n \text{ i.o.}) = 1. Since ϵ\epsilon is arbitrary, lim supnXnlogn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{X_n}{\log n} \ge 1 a.s.

Step 3. Combining Steps 1 and 2 yields lim supnXnlogn=1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{X_n}{\log n} = 1 a.s.

(2) Proof that limnMnlogn=1a.s.\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{M_n}{\log n} = 1 \quad \text{a.s.}

Step 4. Prove lim supnMnlogn1\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{M_n}{\log n} \le 1 a.s. From Part (1), for any δ>0\delta > 0, there exists NN such that Xn<(1+δ)lognX_n < (1+\delta)\log n for all n>Nn > N a.s. Let C=max(X1,,XN)C = \max(X_1, \ldots, X_N). Then Mnmax(C,(1+δ)logn)M_n \le \max(C, (1+\delta)\log n), so Mnlognmax(Clogn,1+δ)1+δ\frac{M_n}{\log n} \le \max\left(\frac{C}{\log n}, 1+\delta\right) \to 1+\delta. Since δ\delta is arbitrary, lim supMnlogn1\limsup \frac{M_n}{\log n} \le 1 a.s.

Step 5. Prove lim infnMnlogn1\liminf_{n \to \infty} \frac{M_n}{\log n} \ge 1 a.s. For 0<ϵ<10 < \epsilon < 1: P(Mn<(1ϵ)logn)=[1n(1ϵ)]nenϵP(M_n < (1-\epsilon)\log n) = [1 - n^{-(1-\epsilon)}]^n \le e^{-n^\epsilon}. Since enϵ<\sum e^{-n^\epsilon} < \infty, by the first Borel--Cantelli lemma, lim infMnlogn1\liminf \frac{M_n}{\log n} \ge 1 a.s.

Step 6. Combining Steps 4 and 5 completes the proof.

Final answer

QED.

Marking scheme

The following is the marking scheme (total: 7 points).


1. Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)

Part (1): lim supXn/logn\limsup X_n / \log n (3 pts)

  • Tail probability computation
  • Correctly compute the general form of the tail probability P(Xn>λlogn)=nλP(X_n > \lambda \log n) = n^{-\lambda}, or the specific expression for λ=1±ϵ\lambda = 1 \pm \epsilon.
  • [1 pt]
  • Upper bound for the limsup (1\le 1)
  • Show that n(1+ϵ)\sum n^{-(1+\epsilon)} converges and invoke the first Borel--Cantelli lemma to conclude lim supXnlogn1\limsup \frac{X_n}{\log n} \le 1 a.s.
  • [1 pt]
  • Lower bound for the limsup (1\ge 1)
  • Show that n(1ϵ)\sum n^{-(1-\epsilon)} diverges, explicitly mention independence (i.i.d.), and invoke the second Borel--Cantelli lemma to conclude lim supXnlogn1\limsup \frac{X_n}{\log n} \ge 1 a.s.
  • [1 pt]

Part (2): limMn/logn\lim M_n / \log n (4 pts)

  • Upper bound logic for the maximum (1\le 1)
  • Use the conclusion of Part (1) (i.e., XnX_n is eventually a.s. less than (1+δ)logn(1+\delta)\log n) to derive the asymptotic behavior of MnM_n.
  • Key logical requirement: Must handle the maximum over the finite prefix. That is, argue Mnmax(C,(1+δ)logn)M_n \le \max(C, (1+\delta)\log n) and that C/logn0C/\log n \to 0.
  • *If the conclusion is merely asserted to follow directly from (1) without addressing the first NN terms, award 1 point.*
  • [2 pts]
  • Lower bound probability setup for the maximum (1\ge 1)
  • Set up the event {Mn<(1ϵ)logn}\{M_n < (1-\epsilon)\log n\} and use independence to write its probability:

P(Mn<(1ϵ)logn)=(1n(1ϵ))nP(M_n < (1-\epsilon)\log n) = (1 - n^{-(1-\epsilon)})^n

  • [1 pt]
  • Convergence analysis for the lower bound of the maximum
  • Correctly analyze the asymptotic behavior of the above probability (e.g., enϵ\approx e^{-n^\epsilon} or prove it is dominated by an integrable function), and show the series converges.
  • Invoke the first Borel--Cantelli lemma to conclude lim infMnlogn1\liminf \frac{M_n}{\log n} \ge 1 a.s.
  • [1 pt]

Total (max 7)


2. Zero-credit items

  • Only proving convergence in probability: Only computing limnP()=0\lim_{n\to\infty} P(\dots) = 0 without discussing almost sure convergence via series convergence (Borel--Cantelli is the core of this problem).
  • Incorrect series convergence test: Claiming nϵ\sum n^{-\epsilon} (ϵ1\epsilon \le 1) converges.
  • Direct substitution: In Part (2), directly assuming MnXnM_n \approx X_n without any probability estimate or logical derivation.
  • Citing the wrong lemma: In the upper bound proof of Part (2), attempting to apply BC1 directly to MnM_n, obtaining the divergent series nϵ\sum n^{-\epsilon}, and falsely claiming it converges.

3. Deductions

  • Missing independence statement (-1): When using the second Borel--Cantelli lemma (Part 1 lower bound proof), failing to mention the "independence" or "i.i.d." condition.
  • Logical gap / incorrect conclusion (-1): In the Part 2 lower bound proof, directly asserting series convergence without any asymptotic analysis of (1n(1ϵ))n(1 - n^{-(1-\epsilon)})^n (e.g., taking logarithms or exponential approximation).
  • Confusing constants and variables (-1): Treating ϵ\epsilon as depending on nn, or failing to state the arbitrariness of ϵ\epsilon in a way that seriously affects the proof structure.
Ask AI ✨