Question
Consider the simple symmetric random walk , , i.i.d., with . (Note .) Let , and . Prove:
Step-by-step solution
Step 1. Prove part (i). First show is a martingale with respect to the natural filtration . Since are i.i.d. with : So is a martingale. Define the stopping time . Since the random walk on a finite interval must exit, a.s. and . Before time , is bounded in , so . By the optional stopping theorem:
Step 2. Use the distribution of to solve for the probability. can only take values or . Let , then . Substituting into the expectation: Solving: , so . Hence . Part (i) is proved.
Step 3. Prove part (ii). Construct the process . Compute: Therefore , so is also a martingale.
Step 4. Apply the optional stopping theorem to to find . Since and increments are bounded, OST applies: So . Using the probabilities from Step 2: Simplifying: Part (ii) is proved.
Final answer
(i) QED. (ii) QED.
Marking scheme
The following is the complete grading rubric for this problem and official solution.
1. Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)
Score exactly one chain | take the maximum subtotal among chains; do not add points across chains.
Chain A: Martingale Approach (Based on Official Solution)
*Part 1: Probability proof (3 pts)*
- [additive] Verify is a martingale (show or use the independent zero-mean increment property). (1 pt)
- [additive] Apply the optional stopping theorem (OST) to get (implicitly or explicitly noting and boundedness). (1 pt)
- [additive] Set up and solve . (1 pt)
*Part 2: Expectation proof (4 pts)*
- [additive] Construct and verify is a martingale (must show and key computations). (1 pt)
- [additive] Apply OST again to get (or equivalently ). (1 pt)
- [additive] Substitute the probability distribution from part 1 to compute . (1 pt)
- [additive] Complete the algebraic simplification from to the final form . (1 pt)
Chain B: Difference Equation / Gambler's Ruin Approach
*Part 1: Probability proof (3 pts)*
- [additive] Set up the difference equation with boundary conditions . (1 pt)
- [additive] Identify the general solution as linear: . (1 pt)
- [additive] Apply boundary conditions to solve for constants and obtain the final probability formula. (1 pt)
*Part 2: Expectation proof (4 pts)*
- [additive] Set up the nonhomogeneous difference equation with . (1 pt)
- [additive] Determine the general solution structure (particular solution plus homogeneous solution ). (1 pt)
- [additive] Apply boundary conditions to set up and solve the system for . (1 pt)
- [additive] Substitute back and simplify to the final form . (1 pt)
Total (max 7)
2. Zero-credit items
- Citing Gambler's Ruin formulas or without derivation.
- Only copying definitions or target formulas without substantive derivation.
- Only verifying specific numerical cases rather than a general proof.
3. Deductions
- -1: Logical gap, e.g., claiming "this is a martingale" without verification, or writing the general solution without the difference equation.
- -1: Missing key qualifiers (e.g., not mentioning finiteness/boundedness of as a prerequisite for applying the theorem).
- -1: Boundary condition error (e.g., swapping the probability values of ).
- -1: Algebraic error leading to a mismatched final result.
- -2: Conceptual confusion, e.g., treating as a constant, or assuming .