Question
Let . Prove that and have the same distribution.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1. By the reflection principle and the distributional properties of the Brownian motion maximum, for a standard Brownian motion , the maximum has the same distribution as . That is, for any , .
Step 2. Consider the process . By Levy's theorem, the process is equal in distribution to the reflected Brownian motion as a stochastic process. That is, and share the same finite-dimensional distributions. This conclusion implies not only that they are identically distributed at each fixed time , but also that they are equal in law as processes.
Step 3. By the conclusion of Levy's theorem above, for a fixed time , the random variable has the same distribution as .
Step 4. Returning to the distribution of : by Step 1, and are identically distributed. Since and are identically distributed, and is also identically distributed with , by transitivity we conclude that and have the same distribution.
Step 5. Direct verification via the joint density. The joint probability density function of is: Let . Since has the same distribution as , the density of is . Levy's theorem directly shows that is equal in distribution to , and is equal in distribution to . Therefore .
Final answer
QED.
Marking scheme
The following rubric is designed for an undergraduate-level mathematics grading of this problem.
1. Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)
Score exactly one chain; take the maximum subtotal among chains; do not add points across chains.
Chain A: Theoretical Citation Path (Based on Levy's Theorem or Reflection Principle)
- [2 pts] Establishing the distribution of : Explicitly state that and are identically distributed, or write out the density/distribution function of (citing the reflection principle or maximum distribution properties).
- [4 pts] Core argument ( distribution): Explicitly cite Levy's Theorem stating that the process (or the random variable ) is equal in distribution to (or ). Alternative: If the theorem name is not cited but a detailed probabilistic analysis, diagram, or reflection-transformation argument correctly establishes the distributional relationship between and reflected Brownian motion, award full 4 pts. If only asserting without any justification, theorem name, or derivation, this core step receives 0 pts.
- [1 pt] Conclusion: Combine the above two points ( and ) and use transitivity to conclude .
Chain B: Analytical Computation Path (Based on Joint Density Function)
- [2 pts] Write out the joint density: Correctly write the joint probability density function of : (with implicit or explicit ).
- [2 pts] Set up the integral/change of variables: Let and correctly set up the integral expression for the marginal density of . If the integration limits are clearly wrong (e.g., not accounting for ), this item receives 0 pts.
- [2 pts] Execute the integral computation: Correctly compute the above integral, deriving the half-normal density (or equivalent form). If the main steps are correct but there is a minor coefficient error, deduct 1 pt; if the computation logic is confused leading to a patched-together result, this item receives 0 pts.
- [1 pt] Comparison and conclusion: Explicitly state that the computed density matches that of (or ), thereby completing the proof.
Total (max 7)
2. Zero-credit items
- Merely recopying the problem conditions or the definitions of with no substantive derivation.
- Only verifying that first or second moments are equal (e.g., ) without proving distributional equality.
- Incorrectly assuming and are independent and attempting to derive the result by directly subtracting marginal distributions.
- Merely asserting by intuition that "by symmetry..." without any concrete support from the reflection principle, Levy's theorem, or integral computation.
3. Deductions
- (-1) Imprecise logical statements: Confusing "almost sure equality" with "equality in distribution ()" (e.g., claiming ), or omitting necessary domain specifications () in differential equations/integrals.
- (-2) Integration limit errors in the computation path: In Chain B, if the integration variable bounds violate the constraints or .
- (-1) Notational confusion: Confusing random variables (uppercase) with realized values (lowercase), causing logical reading difficulties.