Question
Consider the simple symmetric random walk , , where are i.i.d. with . (Note .) Let , with . Prove:
Step-by-step solution
Step 1. Prove part (i). First show is a martingale with respect to . Since , . Define the stopping time . Since the random walk must exit the finite interval, a.s. and . By the optional stopping theorem: .
Step 2. Since , let . Then , giving .
Step 3. Prove part (ii). Construct . Verify using and . So is also a martingale.
Step 4. Apply the optional stopping theorem to : , so . Using the probabilities from part (i): . Simplifying: .
Final answer
(i) QED. (ii) QED.
Marking scheme
The following is the complete rubric for this problem.
1. Checkpoints (max 7 pts total)
Score exactly one chain | take the maximum; do not add across chains.
Chain A: Martingale Approach (Official Solution)
*Part (i): Probability proof (3 pts)*
- Verify is a martingale (show ). (1 pt)
- Apply the optional stopping theorem to get (implicitly or explicitly noting and boundedness). (1 pt)
- Set up and solve . (1 pt)
*Part (ii): Expectation proof (4 pts)*
- Construct and verify is a martingale (showing ). (1 pt)
- Apply the optional stopping theorem to get . (1 pt)
- Substitute the probability distribution from part (i) to compute . (1 pt)
- Complete the algebra to obtain . (1 pt)
Chain B: Difference Equation / Gambler's Ruin Approach
*Part (i) (3 pts)*
- Set up the difference equation with boundary conditions . (1 pt)
- Identify the general solution as linear . (1 pt)
- Solve for constants and obtain the final formula. (1 pt)
*Part (ii) (4 pts)*
- Set up the non-homogeneous difference equation with . (1 pt)
- Determine the general solution structure (particular solution plus homogeneous ). (1 pt)
- Solve for constants from boundary conditions. (1 pt)
- Substitute back and simplify to . (1 pt)
Total (max 7)
2. Zero-credit items
- Citing standard Gambler's Ruin formulas or without derivation.
- Merely copying definitions or target formulas.
- Only verifying specific numerical cases.
3. Deductions
- -1: Logical jumps (e.g., claiming martingale without verification).
- -1: Missing key qualifiers (e.g., not mentioning finiteness of ).
- -1: Boundary condition errors.
- -1: Algebra errors leading to mismatched final result.
- -2: Conceptual confusion (e.g., treating as constant or assuming ).