Question
Let , and denote , , so that is a renewal process.
(1) Prove that .
(2) If the distribution function of is , find the exact analytical expression for .
(3) Using the Key Renewal Theorem, find .
Step-by-step solution
(1) Step 1. Denote . By conditioning on the first renewal epoch , we can establish a renewal equation for . When , , so , giving . When , the process restarts from , so has the same distribution as . Thus:
Step 2. Denote . Let . Substituting into the renewal equation and simplifying: where the source term is .
Step 3. Analyze the sign of . When : . When : . Thus for all .
Step 4. By the renewal equation solution formula, , where is the renewal function. Since and is a nonnegative measure, . Thus , i.e., . QED.
(2) Since , follows an exponential distribution with parameter . The renewal process corresponding to the exponential distribution is a Poisson process, with renewal function (including the unit step at ). From the derivation in (1), satisfies a renewal equation whose solution is: When : When : In summary, .
(3) Denote . Conditioning on , we establish a renewal equation for : Let . This is a standard renewal equation . Verify integrability: Assuming , is directly Riemann integrable. By the Key Renewal Theorem, where .
Final answer
(1) QED.; (2) ; (3)
Marking scheme
The following is the rubric designed for this problem and its official solution.
1. Checkpoints (Total 7 pts)
Part (1) (3 pts)
- Establish the renewal equation for [1 pt]: Correctly write the renewal equation satisfied by , namely . Note: The source term must correctly reflect the relationship between the first renewal epoch and both and .
- Analyze the sign of the difference function or source term [1 pt]: Construct the difference and derive its renewal equation, OR directly analyze the iteration properties of the original equation. Must show the key algebraic steps proving the effective source term (such as in the solution) is nonnegative in both cases and .
- Derive the inequality conclusion [1 pt]: Based on the nonnegativity of the source term and the sign-preserving property of the renewal function (or renewal equation solution), rigorously conclude or .
Part (2) (2 pts)
- Exponential distribution setup and integral formulation [1 pt]: Identify the renewal process properties corresponding to the exponential distribution (such as or ), and correctly establish the specific integral expression. If the specific form of is not substituted and only the general formula is given, no credit.
- Compute the piecewise analytical expression [1 pt]: Correctly compute the integrals for both cases and , and write the final piecewise result (or unified form ). Both parts must be correct for credit; only one case correct receives no credit.
Part (3) (2 pts)
- Mean renewal equation and source term integral [1 pt]: Write the renewal equation for , and verify that the integral of its source term over equals . Key point: must show the computation of or explain why it equals the second moment.
- Apply the Key Renewal Theorem (KRT) [1 pt]: Cite the Key Renewal Theorem, derive the limit as , and give the final result .
Total (max 7)
2. Zero-credit items
- Part (1): Only intuitively describing that "the interval covering tends to be longer than a typical interval" (length-biased sampling intuition) without providing a rigorous mathematical proof (such as renewal equation or coupling argument), receives 0 pts.
- Part (1): Only verifying the cases or without proving for all , receives 0 pts.
- Part (3): Without deriving via the renewal theorem, directly writing the expectation formula for the "length-biased distribution" without derivation, receives 0 pts (the problem explicitly requires "using the Key Renewal Theorem").
3. Deductions
- Concept confusion: Mistakenly computing (the total lifetime covering ) as the residual life () or the current age, leading to incorrect results in Part (2) or (3) (e.g., obtaining the residual life limit ): that part receives 0 pts.
- Lack of existence verification: In Part (3), if or Riemann integrability conditions are not mentioned, no deduction.
- Sign error: If the logic is reversed when proving the inequality (e.g., assuming the conclusion first then deriving), deduct 1 pt.
- Integration computation error: Pure arithmetic/integration errors in Part (2) or (3) with completely correct approach, deduct 1 pt.